De ?zachte? sturing van de arbeidsvoorwaardenvorming

Houten, Gijs van; Torenvlied, René

doi:10.1347/benm.29.4.181.11363

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the so-called leading principle of “own strength” the Dutch government wanted to clarify that an appeal for government support should not be an automatism (Bredewold et al, 2018 ; Bruggeman et al, 2018 ). Only when there are no other resources at hand, such as care by family members or money, an appeal to government aid becomes an option (Bruggeman et al, 2018 ; Rijksoverheid, 2013 ; Van Houten et al, 2008 ). Social security and professional care are reduced.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vulnerable persons in society: an insider’s perspective

Numans¹,

Regenmortel

Schalk

et al. 2020

International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vulnerable persons in society: an insider’s perspective

Numans¹,

Regenmortel

Schalk

et al. 2020

International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…By promoting social participation and self-reliance the Dutch government wanted to clarify that appealing for government support should no longer be automatic (Bredewold et al, 2018;Bruggeman et al, 2018). Only when a person has no other resources at hand, such as care provided by a social network or money of their own, does appealing to government aid become an option (Van Houten et al, 2008;Rijksoverheid, 2013;Bruggeman et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Narratives of societal vulnerability. An insider’s critical reflection on social policy practice

Numans

Boog²,

Regenmortel

et al. 2023

SWSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite social policies’ aim to realize an inclusive society, social exclusion of vulnerable groups happens. We analyse the experiences of vulnerable persons with practices of implementation of social policies. The analysis of data of in-depth interviews brings to the fore critical notes of vulnerable persons’ interactions with social policy practitioners. This insider’s perspective provides insight in how they experience access to social rights. Respondents report feelings of intensified vulnerability, a confrontation with too much bureaucracy, and a range of insufficiencies in practitioners’ approaches. The bureaucratic contexts often fail to meet persons needs due to protocols and budget restrictions. In order to implement a more individualized approach practitioners need discretionary space in which they can apply moral-ethical considerations, and are responsive to personal requests. Based on the acknowledgment of the insider’s perspective and addressing the shortcomings of the social policy practice, practitioners can pave the way for more social justice.

show abstract

Van poldermodel naar lobbymodel? / From Polder model to lobby model?

Torenvlied¹

2005

B en M - Beleid en Maatschappij

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

De ?zachte? sturing van de arbeidsvoorwaardenvorming

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Vulnerable persons in society: an insider’s perspective

Vulnerable persons in society: an insider’s perspective

Narratives of societal vulnerability. An insider’s critical reflection on social policy practice

Van poldermodel naar lobbymodel? / From Polder model to lobby model?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About