De zevenkoppige draak van ongelijkheid

Abstract

Article 25fa pilot End User Agreement This publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act (Auteurswet) with explicit consent by the author. Dutch law entitles the maker of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' pilot project. In this pilot research outputs of researchers employed by Dutch Universities that comply with the legal requirements of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act are distributed online and free of cost or other barriers in institutional repositories. Research outputs are distributed six months after their first online publication in the original published version and with proper attribution to the source of the original publication. You are permitted to download and use the publication for personal purposes. All rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyrights owner(s) of this work. Any use of the publication other than authorised under this licence or copyright law is prohibited. If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons.

The organizational inclusion turn and its exclusion of low-wage labor

“…In general, studies on organizational inclusion have been limited by an inward orientation on single employers and individual perceptions of employees, failing to capture the complexity or organizational embeddedness in a wider national and sector/industry context (Dobusch, 2014; van den Brink, 2017). While Shore et al (2018) do not explicitly address the relationship between the organization and its environment in their inclusion themes, other scholars do engage with this issue.…”

“Reinventing the wheel over and over again”. Organizational learning, memory and forgetting in doing diversity work

“…This research shows that progress is vulnerable and internal and external pressures, for instance, the financial crisis or mergers, can throw progression back. Although a process-based view on change is common in the field of (critical) diversity management (Janssens and Steyaert, 2019), we often hold a linear view in terms of outcomes (van den Brink, 2018). This study showed that organizational learning is a continuous and iterative process in which an environment is created in which organization members can learn, reflect and experiment.…”

“…Despite numerous initiatives aiming to transform organizations into more equal, inclusive and diverse work places, progress remains À at bestslow (Dobbin and Kalev, 2016;Evans, 2014). Diversity practices rarely translate into deep systemic change (Acker, 2006;Leenders et al, 2019), as interventions often stay superficial (Ahmed, 2007;Eriksson-Zetterquist and Styhre, 2008), geared toward fixing women/minorities (Ely and Meyerson, 2000;Zanoni et al, 2010) and are implemented rather ad hoc (Benschop et al, 2015;van den Brink, 2018) or even become counterproductive (Romani et al, 2019). In addition, planned diversity interventions barely lead to sustainable change in the long run as it is difficult to change norms and daily practices of organizational members (Eriksson-Zetterquist and Renemark, 2016;Acker, 2000).…”