Deactivation Mechanisms of Engineering Adsorbents for VOCs Adsorption and the Lifetime-Prolonging Strategy

Abstract

Adsorption−desorption process has been considered as a promising way for both the removal and recovery of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from waste gases. However, during the engineering applications of the adsorbents, they would be deactivated or deteriorated. Herein, the deactivation mechanisms of different engineering VOC adsorbents (activated carbons and silica gels) by different processes or parameters have been investigated. It is found that the deactivation of adsorbents is mainly attributed to the following reasons: accumulation of VOCs in the pores, breaking of the pore structures due to the frequentchanging of processing conditions, occupation of the pores by water or other impurities, and so forth. For the temperature swing adsorption (TSA) process, the performance of adsorbents would be deteriorated by (i) the accumulation of VOCs due to incomplete desorption or (ii) the collapse of the pore structure of adsorbents (e.g., activated carbons and microporous silica gel) due to frequent cooling and heating between adsorption and desorption, respectively, leading to the deactivation of adsorbents. This phenomenon could be weakened when the pores in the adsorbents increased (e.g., the mesoporous silica gel, SG B). For the vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) process, the pore structure of adsorbents was slightly influenced during the adsorption−desorption cycles. The decrease in the adsorption capacity of adsorbents was mainly ascribed to the accumulation of VOC chemicals in the pores. In addition, in the TSA or VSA process, when the water vapor was present, the adsorption performance of adsorbents will be significantly reduced due to the occupation of adsorption sites by the water, resulting in faster deactivation. Considering the processing cost and lifetime of adsorbents, the TSA and VSA are combined together herein. The results show that, compared with the single TSA and VSA, the combined VSA−TSA process could be applied to different VOCs and improve the desorption rate of the adsorbents greatly at lower energy consumption and longer lifetime.

In-Situ Grown UiO-66-NH2 Nanofibrous Membrane for Highly Effective Capture PM2.5 and VOCs

“…For the removal of VOCs, many techniques are available, such as adsorption, photocatalysis, and catalytic oxidation . Adsorption, as one of the most widely used technologies, has excellent characteristics, such as high efficiency and low energy consumption. − Moreover, highly effective adsorbents are particularly important, and their development has always been the goal of adsorption technologies. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs), as porous crystalline materials, have high specific surface areas and rich surface functional groups; thus, they have an outstanding adsorption performance .…”