1963
DOI: 10.1093/bja/35.8.454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deadspace in Paediatric Anaesthetic Apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was almost identical with the arrangement described by Voss (1963) for the investigation of the deadspace in some types of apparatus for paediatric anaesthesia. A closely similar experimental procedure was followed.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was almost identical with the arrangement described by Voss (1963) for the investigation of the deadspace in some types of apparatus for paediatric anaesthesia. A closely similar experimental procedure was followed.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The total deadspace at each fresh gas flow was calculated from the following formula, which was employed by Voss (1963)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clappison and Hamilton (1956), showed that increasing the dead space in normal unmedicated subjects led to increase in tidal volume and rate which were not sufficient to correct end-expiratory CO2 tension. The problem of apparatus dead space in paediatric anaesthetic apparatus has been well summarised 'by Voss '(1963) in an assessment of the Magill, Potter and Cape Town gas circuits applied to 'paediatric practice. The Cape Town system has been found to be the most suitable for small children and also has the virtue of extreme simplicity and versatility.…”
Section: Pulmonary Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cape Town system has been found to be the most suitable for small children and also has the virtue of extreme simplicity and versatility. This system, (Voss, 1963), was evolved in 1954 'at the Red Cross WarMemorial Children's 'Hospital and is used here as standard apparatus for neonates and small 6hildren. It consists of a standard angle piece with a tube of 6 mm.…”
Section: Pulmonary Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the likely basis for the belief that the T‐piece is more suitable for small children and that systems such as the Magill attachment (Mapleson A system) are unsuitable for children below 20 kg body weight. Voss showed that using facemasks in inhalation anaesthesia for in children necessitated flushing out the mask using the fresh gas flow to decrease the dead space [1]. However, Ayre's T‐piece (later, the Jackson Rees modification) was introduced for children under the specific conditions of tracheal anaesthesia [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%