1983
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2604.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deaf Speakers' Laryngeal Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics include abnormal variations in speech rate, 2,3 increased voice intensity, 4 variability in fundamental frequency (F 0 ), 2,3,5,6 abnormal intonation contours, 3,6 inaccurate production of vowels, 2,7-9 excessive nasality and/or resonance irregularities, 10-12 irregular tongue positioning, 2,13-15 and inadequate laryngeal function. [15][16][17][18] Research has shown that after prolonged hearing loss, postlingually deaf adults can develop voice and speech abnormalities similar to prelingually deaf adults including deviations in intonation, 19 pitch/F 0 , 19,20 speech rate [19][20][21] and vowel duration, 19,20 nasality, 19 articulation, 19,20 voice intensity, 19,22 and tongue positioning. 23 However, postlingually deaf adults have been shown to effectively regain speech discrimination, voice quality, and speech production capabilities following implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These characteristics include abnormal variations in speech rate, 2,3 increased voice intensity, 4 variability in fundamental frequency (F 0 ), 2,3,5,6 abnormal intonation contours, 3,6 inaccurate production of vowels, 2,7-9 excessive nasality and/or resonance irregularities, 10-12 irregular tongue positioning, 2,13-15 and inadequate laryngeal function. [15][16][17][18] Research has shown that after prolonged hearing loss, postlingually deaf adults can develop voice and speech abnormalities similar to prelingually deaf adults including deviations in intonation, 19 pitch/F 0 , 19,20 speech rate [19][20][21] and vowel duration, 19,20 nasality, 19 articulation, 19,20 voice intensity, 19,22 and tongue positioning. 23 However, postlingually deaf adults have been shown to effectively regain speech discrimination, voice quality, and speech production capabilities following implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have shown that speakers born deaf or deafened before learning English "blur" the distinction between voiced and voiceless consonants; they fail to implement this phonemic contrast with sufficienlly differentiated VOT (Monsen, 1976), airflow (Whitehead and Barefoot, 1980), intraoral air pressure (Hutchinson and Smith, 1976) and laryngeal gestures (Mahshie and Conture, 1983). Levitt and Stromberg (1983), analyzing corpora obtained from congenitally deaf children by Smith (1975) and Gold (1978Gold ( , 1980, list under "asynchrony errors" numerous substitutions of voiced for voiceless cognates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate laryngeal activity of four normally hearing and four hearing-impaired persons was found during productions of word-initial voiced and voiceless consonants with a flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope [62]. Three of the hearing-impaired subjects exhibited greater variability than their normally hearing peers in terms of the degree and duration of vocal fold abduction during voiceless consonant productions, but only one exhibited excessively wide glottal openings, suggesting that deaf persons waste air during speech production.…”
Section: Laryngeal Featuresmentioning
confidence: 87%