1952
DOI: 10.2307/3468002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deafness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While scattered other reports peppered the literature in the 1950s and 1960s, interest in PW waned over the latter half of the 20th century. It is described as an indication for surgical intervention in conductive hearing loss by Lewis (32), and in the context of occupational hearing loss by Johnston (33). Shapiro (34) offered a summative perspective of PW, with a literature review spanning Holder original description through Sullivan and Hodges experiments in the 1950s-he concludes that no more can be offered today than 300 years ago when the Royal Philosophical Society first heard of PW.…”
Section: The Fallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scattered other reports peppered the literature in the 1950s and 1960s, interest in PW waned over the latter half of the 20th century. It is described as an indication for surgical intervention in conductive hearing loss by Lewis (32), and in the context of occupational hearing loss by Johnston (33). Shapiro (34) offered a summative perspective of PW, with a literature review spanning Holder original description through Sullivan and Hodges experiments in the 1950s-he concludes that no more can be offered today than 300 years ago when the Royal Philosophical Society first heard of PW.…”
Section: The Fallmentioning
confidence: 99%