2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealiasing techniques for high-order spectral element methods on regular and irregular grids

Abstract: 14.07.15 KB. Accepted for pub, indefinite embargo applied until published then 12 month embarg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the DG method [11,23,24,29,31,35,43] and in the finite element method [5,8,16,20,26,27]. This paper exploits the version the discontinuous Galerkin method where the continuity and boundary conditions are enforced by the finite difference rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the DG method [11,23,24,29,31,35,43] and in the finite element method [5,8,16,20,26,27]. This paper exploits the version the discontinuous Galerkin method where the continuity and boundary conditions are enforced by the finite difference rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we found that DG (Q > P) and FR DG(Q > P) are identical when using Q > P for linear and nonlinear flux functions as well as for regular and irregular tensor-product meshes 3 . This indicates that polynomial aliasing sources for these two schemes are identical and can therefore be addressed using equivalent strategies, such as the consistent integration (through additional quadrature points) of the nonlinearities arising either from the equations themselves or from the geometry [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this case uses three-dimensional curvilinear elements, the choice of quadrature order can affect stability as shown in [26]. We therefore increase the number of integration points by a factor of 2, compared to the previous two-dimensional simulations, in each direction in order to avoid aliasing effects.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%