Cognitive Developmental Change 2005
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511489938.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with change: manifestations, measurements and methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 165 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Huck and McLean (1975) , change scores provide the same useful information as a repeated-measures ANOVA in a “more straightforward, parsimonious manner” (p. 517). An issue with the use of change scores is its possible reduced reliability when compared to the two constituent measures themselves ( Cattell, 1982 ; Grigorenko and O’Keefe, 2004 ; Thomas and Zumbo, 2012 ). However, in certain instances, change scores can be validly used – such as in the case of sufficiently powered studies ( Thomas and Zumbo, 2012 ).…”
Section: Study 1: a Develop Mindset And Cultivation Strategy Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Huck and McLean (1975) , change scores provide the same useful information as a repeated-measures ANOVA in a “more straightforward, parsimonious manner” (p. 517). An issue with the use of change scores is its possible reduced reliability when compared to the two constituent measures themselves ( Cattell, 1982 ; Grigorenko and O’Keefe, 2004 ; Thomas and Zumbo, 2012 ). However, in certain instances, change scores can be validly used – such as in the case of sufficiently powered studies ( Thomas and Zumbo, 2012 ).…”
Section: Study 1: a Develop Mindset And Cultivation Strategy Usementioning
confidence: 99%