2019
DOI: 10.15448/1984-4301.2019.4.36113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with jokes in the ESL class: a pedagogical proposal centred on comprehension

Abstract: This paper makes a pedagogical proposal to delve into jokes in the ESL classroom and sensitise learners to their complexity. It consists of five instructional phases and is based, on the one hand, on another proposal to teach the pragmatics of speech acts in an L2. On the other hand, this proposal relies on a relevance-theoretic classification of jokes made on the basis of the various linguistic, cultural and cognitive factors that humorists exploit in their production. Since it only centres on how different t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these difficulties in humor integration in their classes, most of the respondents held positive views concerning the cognitive and affective functions of humor in teaching and learning. The reported benefits of humor in this study fall into the two categories of cognitive (Garner, 2006;Tocalli-Beller & Swain, 2007;Chabeli, 2008;Margoob, 2017) and affective (Petraki & Nguyen, 2016;Cruz, 2019) as outlined by previous research (see 2.3). What is, however, noticeable in the Tunisian teachers' responses is limiting the rewarding uses of humor to a sole function which pertains to the cognitive category: better retention of content and easier assimilation of input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Notwithstanding these difficulties in humor integration in their classes, most of the respondents held positive views concerning the cognitive and affective functions of humor in teaching and learning. The reported benefits of humor in this study fall into the two categories of cognitive (Garner, 2006;Tocalli-Beller & Swain, 2007;Chabeli, 2008;Margoob, 2017) and affective (Petraki & Nguyen, 2016;Cruz, 2019) as outlined by previous research (see 2.3). What is, however, noticeable in the Tunisian teachers' responses is limiting the rewarding uses of humor to a sole function which pertains to the cognitive category: better retention of content and easier assimilation of input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It is well-documented in the literature that humor has myriad positive effects in the field of language learning. Recurrent affective advantages of humor in previous research include establishing a strong rapport between learners and instructors (Kovar, 2017), alleviating classroom tension and reducing anxiety (Petraki & Nguyen, 2016;Cruz, 2019), and fostering group cohesion and learners' sense of belonging . These emotional effects can be "conductive to long-term learning" which ultimately leads to a "high level of second language performance" (Tocalli-Beller & Swain's, 2007, p. 165/166).…”
Section: Humor Between Rewards and Risksmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations