Business Research 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-03748-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with Practical Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
273
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
273
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the researcher was interested in capturing the participants’ perspectives and interpretations of the subject. Therefore, rather than confirming or testing a hypothesis as in quantitative studies, the research aimed at exploring patterns (Collis & Hussey, 2009). Moreover, a qualitative approach is recommended when little is known about a particular area of study (Eisenhardt, 1989b), as is the case with the concept of managerial wisdom (Gibson, 2008; Rowley & Gibbs, 2008; Rowley & Slack, 2009).…”
Section: The Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the researcher was interested in capturing the participants’ perspectives and interpretations of the subject. Therefore, rather than confirming or testing a hypothesis as in quantitative studies, the research aimed at exploring patterns (Collis & Hussey, 2009). Moreover, a qualitative approach is recommended when little is known about a particular area of study (Eisenhardt, 1989b), as is the case with the concept of managerial wisdom (Gibson, 2008; Rowley & Gibbs, 2008; Rowley & Slack, 2009).…”
Section: The Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research draws on the phenomenological and interpretative paradigms (Collis & Hussey, 2003), including the epistemological tradition of constructivism and interpretive hermeneutics (McManus Holroyd, 2007). It is relativist, transactional, and subjectivist (Guba & Lincoln, 1998), emphasising the non-objective truth and the application of diverse constructed interpretations (Berger & Luckmann, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, cross-sectional research is criticized broadly because, by its very nature, it records data from only one point in time. Therefore, while it is possible to test the nature of relationships and correlations, it is not possible to explain unequivocally why such relationships exist (Collis & Hussey, 2003). The intention of this research was to test the hypothesized relationships, and, while longitudinal data would be ideal in testing causality, it is not always practical.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concerns imposed limitations on this research and have resulted in a cross-sectional research design. We suggest that, for future research, where feasible, longitudinal research would be the preferred research design as it allows the researcher to measure the nature of relationships over time, as well as their degree of stability records data from one point in time (Collis & Hussey, 2003).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%