Dealing with Uncertainty in GHG Inventories: How to Go About It?

Abstract

The assessment of greenhouse gases emitted to and removed from the atmosphere is high on both political and scientific agendas. Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Parties to the Convention publish annual or periodic national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Policymakers use these inventories to develop strategies and policies for emission reductions and to track the progress of these policies. However, greenhouse gas inventories (whether at the global, national, corporate, or other level) contain uncertainty for a variety of reasons, and these uncertainties have important scientific and policy implications. For scientific, political, and economic reasons it is important to deal with the uncertainty of emissions estimates proactively. Proper treatment of uncertainty affects everything from our understanding of the physical system to the economics of mitigation strategies and the politics of mitigation agreements. A comprehensive and consistent understanding of, and a framework for dealing with, the uncertainty of emissions estimates should have a large impact on the functioning and effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol and its successor. This chapter attempts to

Regional non-CO2greenhouse gas fluxes inferred from atmospheric measurements in Ontario, Canada

“…Compiling proper emission inventories for CH 4 and N 2 O is even more complex and the emission inventories are thus often reported to be more uncertain (Olivier et al 1999;Jonas et al 2010;NRC 2010). For the latter gases emission inventories commonly have to apply a parameterization to estimate emissions using mean emission ratios for e.g.…”

Bitcoin‐Based Decentralized Carbon Emissions Trading Infrastructure Model

“…The findings showed a weak correlation between trading items' prices and emissions reduction costs; lack of effectiveness which discourages individuals to engage in the trading process; and insufficient information provision which reduces the ability to take decisions by the agents who showed interest in the trading. Jonas et al [2010] stated that when uncertainties are considered, then all exchanging parties will gain more profit than before. Market-triggering indicators should be considered in a way that complies with the complexities intrinsically contained in the emission market settings.…”

Addressing uncertainty upstream or downstream of accounting for emissions reductions from deforestation and forest degradation

“…At present, there are no internationally accepted guidelines regulating uncertainty following carbon accounting. Parties to the UNFCCC are encouraged, but not obliged, to report on uncertainty in their national GHG inventory (IPCC 2003(IPCC , 2006Jonas et al 2010b). Under KP, GHG inventory uncertainty is monitored, so countries that have emission reduction commitments are requested to report on uncertainty levels (Jonas et al 2010a, b), but it is not regulated, which means that there are no rules to limit or discount for uncertainty when evaluating compliance.…”