2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2018.8430866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with Unknown Unknowns: Identification and Selection of Minimal Sensing for Fractional Dynamics with Unknown Inputs

Abstract: This paper focuses on analysis and design of timevarying complex networks having fractional order dynamics. These systems are key in modeling the complex dynamical processes arising in several natural and man made systems.Notably, examples include neurophysiological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG) that captures the variation in potential fields, and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal, which serves as a proxy for neuronal activity. Notwithstanding, the complex networks originated by loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regularization parameter λ was obtained experimentally (λ = 0.4) while assessing the total mean squared error of the one-step ahead prediction capabilities in a testing subset. Notice that the change of the objective is crucial to ensure that the unknown inputs are close to the real external input to the different ROIs -see more details in (50). Therefore, future work should examine the robustness of our results and test the sensitivity of our observations to different methodological choices, including the dimensions of the input matrix, the size of the system identification window, and the value of the regularization parameter.…”
Section: Linear Time-invariant (Lti) Dynamical Systems With External mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The regularization parameter λ was obtained experimentally (λ = 0.4) while assessing the total mean squared error of the one-step ahead prediction capabilities in a testing subset. Notice that the change of the objective is crucial to ensure that the unknown inputs are close to the real external input to the different ROIs -see more details in (50). Therefore, future work should examine the robustness of our results and test the sensitivity of our observations to different methodological choices, including the dimensions of the input matrix, the size of the system identification window, and the value of the regularization parameter.…”
Section: Linear Time-invariant (Lti) Dynamical Systems With External mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the inability of models such as DCM to capture signal variations beyond those caused by the external inputs makes the connectivity estimation highly dependent on the assumed number and form of the inputs (94). In this work, we treat the exogenous inputs to the cortex as unknown in the model, and we simultaneously estimate the internal system parameters and unknown excitations leveraging recent developments in linear systems theory (50). To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first use of joint-estimation for an LTI system and its unknown inputs in the context to BOLD dynamics, which allows us to uncover the spatiotemporal structure of the drivers of cortical activity and provides new insights on how the brain responds to the requirements of the ongoing task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the classical linear time-invariant dynamics, the evolution of the system's states is determined by the current states, namely it is Markovian time dependent. In this issue, Cao et al [28] investigate the controllability of the discrete-time fractional-order linear dynamical networks [45], where the system's non-Markovian time properties are incorporated with longterm memory. They present the trade-offs between the MDNS and the time to control based on the concept of actuation spectrum [46].…”
Section: Driver Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used for these experiments are from subject 11 from the CHB-MIT Scalp EEG database [45]. To achieve this identification, we leveraged the tools developed in [46], which led us to…”
Section: Closed-loop Neurotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%