A class of (N,N′-diaryl-α-diimine)Pd complexes bearing amide substituents on the N-aryl rings is described. Hydrogen bonding interactions involving the amide groups influence the structures, isomer distributions, and ligand coordination behavior of these compounds. The amidefunctionalizedwere prepared by condensation reactions of 2,3-butanedione and the appropriate anilines. The attempted preparation of (2,6-i Pr 2 -Ph)NCMeCMeN(2-C(O)NHMe-6-i Pr-Ph) (4d) yielded the corresponding 1,2dihydroquinazolinone derivative 4d′ formed by nucleophilic attack of the amide nitrogen at the proximal imine carbon. 4a and 4b react with (cod)PdMeCl to yield square planar (α-diimine)PdMeCl complexes 5a,a′ and 5b,b′, respectively, which exist as two isomers that differ in the orientation (trans/cis) of the Pd−Me ligand and the amide-substituted arylimine unit. 4c reacts with (MeCN) 2 PdCl 2 and (cod)PdMeCl to yield (4c)PdCl 2 (6c-anti,syn) and ( 4c)PdMeCl (5c-anti,syn), which exhibit anti/syn isomerism due to hindered rotation of the C aryl −N bonds. In the solid state, the amide oxygen atoms in 6c-anti and 5c-syn engage in hydrogen bonding with cocrystallized CH 2 Cl 2 solvent molecules. 4d′ reacts with (MeCN) 2 PdCl 2 via ring-opening metalation to afford the α-diimine complex (4d)PdCl 2 (6d). Transmetalation of 6d with SnMe 4 yields (4d)PdMeCl (5d,d′) as a mixture of trans and cis isomers. The reaction of 5d,d′ with AgOAc yields (4d)PdMe(OAc) (7d) as a single isomer in which the Pd−Me group is trans to the amide-functionalized arylimine unit. 5d, 6d, and 7d exhibit intramolecular N−H•••Cl and N−H•••O hydrogen bonding interactions involving the amide NH units. The reactions of 5a,a′, 5c-anti, and 5d,d′ with AgSbF 6 in the presence of pyrazole yield the corresponding (α-diimine)PdMe(pz) + SbF 6 − salts (8a,c,d; pz = pyrazole), which exhibit an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the amide oxygen and the pyrazole NH unit. 8a,c,d undergo partial dissociation of pyrazole in CD 3 CN solution to generate the corresponding CD 3 CN complexes 9a,c,d. The non-hydrogen-bonded complex {(2,6-i Pr 2 -Ph)NCMeCMeN(2,6-i Pr 2 -Ph)}PdMe(pz) + SbF 6 − (8e) and its pyrazole dissociation product {(2,6-i Pr 2 -Ph)N CMeCMeN(2,6-i Pr 2 -Ph)}PdMe(CD 3 CN) + SbF 6 − (9e) were generated in a similar fashion. The pyrazole dissociation constants, K eq = [(α-diimine)PdMe(CD 3 CN) + ] × [pz] × [(α-diimine)PdMe(pz) + ] −1 , vary in the order 8e > 8d > 8a > 8c, span more than 2 orders of magnitude, and reflect the enhancement of pyrazole binding in 8a,c,d by amide−pyrazole hydrogen bonding. The intramolecular hydrogen bonding in 8c strengthens pyrazole binding by a factor of ca. 120 (i.e., ΔΔG = 2.8(1) kcal mol −1 ) relative to the case of 8e.