2013
DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2013.823263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Death in three scenes of recitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the Congress party, which was being led by M. K. Gandhi, and its official credo of non-violence to achieve political independence from the British, 2 Bhagat Singh was a member of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA), a revolutionary outfit which believed in the dictatorship of the proletariat and was not averse to using violence to achieve it. Recently, various scholars of the Indian anti-colonial revolutionary movement (Elam, 2013; Maclean, 2015; Maclean & Elam, 2013; Moffat, 2019; Sawhney, 2013) have contested the appropriation of these revolutionaries, especially Bhagat Singh, by the official Indian left and highlighted the problem inherent in naming them committed ‘Marxists’ or ‘Communists’. According to Maclean and Elam, ‘Bhagat Singh and the HSRA promiscuously combined many varied strains of political thought that a comprehensive list might read like a Borges short story’ (2013, p. 114).…”
Section: Bhagat Singh and His Heroic Stardommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the Congress party, which was being led by M. K. Gandhi, and its official credo of non-violence to achieve political independence from the British, 2 Bhagat Singh was a member of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA), a revolutionary outfit which believed in the dictatorship of the proletariat and was not averse to using violence to achieve it. Recently, various scholars of the Indian anti-colonial revolutionary movement (Elam, 2013; Maclean, 2015; Maclean & Elam, 2013; Moffat, 2019; Sawhney, 2013) have contested the appropriation of these revolutionaries, especially Bhagat Singh, by the official Indian left and highlighted the problem inherent in naming them committed ‘Marxists’ or ‘Communists’. According to Maclean and Elam, ‘Bhagat Singh and the HSRA promiscuously combined many varied strains of political thought that a comprehensive list might read like a Borges short story’ (2013, p. 114).…”
Section: Bhagat Singh and His Heroic Stardommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, these also include, from other scholars working closely with Maclean and Ghosh: 'love,' 'atheism,' 'youth,' and, of course, 'violence.' 3 'Revolutionary' is an especially difficult term, forged in a sometimes playful and sometimes hostile relationship with British surveillance, Indian moderates, and international supporters. It is an identification with French, Russian, and Irish histories, but its proud recuperation was made possible by the illicit circulation of Political Trouble in India and the Rowlatt Report.…”
Section: 'To Recognize "How It Really Was"'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Death was a reality that the revolutionaries of the HSRA imagined, anticipated and welcomed. 63 Although they refuted the consolations of religion, many of their admirers did not, and so religious tropes became a particularly compelling way to express, and more importantly to visualize, the revolutionaries' mortality and to lament their young deaths. A rich array of motifs drawn from religious traditions, from Hinduism (poems that imagine Bhagat Singh playing Holi with his own blood) to Christianity (in which Bhagat Singh is rendered as a crucified Christ) were brought to the task of commemorating revolutionary politics.…”
Section: Kama Macleanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, impossible to reduce Bhagat Singh to the canonically revolutionary politics of Vladimir Lenin without taking into account his Stowe-esque demand to feel right . As Simona Sawhney has noted, to account for Bhagat Singh’s writings without accounting for his notion of “love” ( prem, ishq , pyaar ) is to diminish the power of his secular, humanist, critique (Sawhney, 2013). Indian anti-imperial critique did not simply recreate the hierarchies embedded in the narrow encircling of the political sphere, and we do it a grave disservice by insisting that it answer to those concerns in the present.…”
Section: Sentimentmentioning
confidence: 99%