Death penalty in Indonesia: between criminal law and Islamic law perspectives

Abstract

This study seeks to discuss the implication of the regulation of the death penalty following the promulgation of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Penal Code which has changed the standing of the death penalty from basic punishment to special punishment seen from the perspectives of positive law and Islamic law. This study employed socio-legal methods, presenting two primary issues of the reconstruction of the regulation concerning the death penalty in Indonesia and how Islamic law reinforces the reconstruction of the regulation of the death penalty in Indonesia. This study has brought to the following two conclusions: notwithstanding its application of the death penalty in the country, Indonesia is attempting to restrict its application. The reformed Criminal Law, particularly after the promulgation of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning Criminal Law, adjourns the death penalty, while the defendant on a death row is given a chance to fix his/her attitude for a particular period (10 years). When the defendant demonstrates a good attitude within this time frame, the imposed death penalty is superseded by imprisonment. This policy is intended to serve as the last resort when the defendant cannot be corrected and as the middle way of balancing between the pros and cons of the death penalty in Indonesia. Moreover, Islamic values as the source of law are also behind these pros and cons, reinforcing the existence of the death penalty in Indonesia, considering that the death penalty from the Islamic view remains recognized as one of the applicable punishment practices.

Social Reintegration after the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Code

“…47 Although practitioners argued that the dynamics of power and control between victims, perpetrators, supporters and facilitators were neutralized during the conference, due to the Restorative Justice script, the girls' experiences increasingly demonstrated an opposing perspective. 48 The experience of the dynamics of power and control that occur in the Restorative Justice conference arena challenges practitioners' opinions regarding Restorative Justice as a neutral process. 49 A 'just' culture aims to respond to concerns about an error-free approaches on the one hand and concerns about people's continued willingness to report safety-related issues on the other.…”