Debating Resource-Driven Development: A Comparative Analysis of Media Coverage on the Pacific Northwest LNG Project in British Columbia

Abstract

In Canada, the provincial government of British Columbia has been keen on building an export-oriented liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry since 2011. This paper examines media coverage of the Pacific NorthWest LNG project (PNW), which was considered as the flagship proposal leading the BC LNG development, until its abrupt cancellation in July 2017. The paper explores the differences between public, commercial, and independent media in energy reporting by tracing how six Canadian media outlets covered the rise and fall of PNW over a 36 month period. The comparative analysis reveals that when addressing the project's cancellation, fossil fuel advocates repeatedly deployed the "jobs killed by environmentalists" argument via opinion pieces appearing in commercial newspapers. This diagnosis, however, downplayed the far-reaching impacts of falling Asian LNG market conditions prior to the cancellation. By comparison, independent media played an important role in assisting LNG opponents to communicate PNW's fragile economic basis to a wide audience. Overall, these findings shed light upon the significance of independent media in supporting diverse news accounts of energy controversies.

The fate of bitumen: an exploratory study of national newspaper coverage of Alberta’s bitumen industry during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Thus, despite the vulnerability of Canada’s resource-dependent economy exposed by the pandemic-induced energy market volatility, energy discourses in mainstream Canadian media continue to view decarbonization as a secondary concern compared to restoring pre-pandemic economic normalcy. This is consistent with previous research on climate change and media issue attention cycles (e.g., Chen 2020 ; Dusyk et al 2018 ; Stoddart et al 2021 ), which has found that prominent domestic and international political events frequently divert public attention away from climate change mitigation, notwithstanding the issue’s growing urgency. In the current case, the pro-bitumen narratives provided economic and political justifications for climate change denialism 2.0 (Buck 2021 , Tindall et al 2021 ).…”

“…Notably, how decarbonization will affect the future of the domestic oil and gas sector has become an increasingly divisive issue in the Canadian public sphere, with the media playing a crucial role in mediating competing claims and narratives. This is evidenced by recent public controversies concerning mega Canadian fossil fuel projects (e.g., the Northern Gateway Pipeline project and the Pacific NorthWest Liquefied Natural Gas project), during which different news outlets disseminated relevant coverage that reflected competing stakeholder concerns (Chen 2020 ; Dusyk et al 2018 ).…”

A Bridge to Where? Tracing the Bridge Fuel Metaphor in the Canadian Media Sphere

“…But overall, bridge fuel references in Canadian media remained low during 2016-2019. By comparison, during the same period Canadian national newspapers the Globe and Mail and the National Post alone produced more than 300 articles on the BC LNG controversy (Chen, 2020). Canadian media's lack of attention to bridge fuel presents a surprising finding, considering the country's continuing efforts on expanding fracking activities in recent years (see Thomas et al, 2017).…”

Using Structural Topic Modeling to Explore the Role of Framing in Shaping the Debate on Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals in Oregon

“…Chen and Gunster (2016) analyzed pro-LNG information sources in British Columbia, Canada, and found two main themes: one emphasizing economic benefits and the other the “clean” nature of natural gas when compared to other fossil fuels, echoing some of the same frames found surrounding fracking. Examining media coverage specific to the Pacific LNG export project in British Columbia, Chen, 2020 again uncovered a framing contest pitting the economy versus the environment—this time stoked by pro-LNG forces and particularly prevalent in commercial media. Independent media outlets, instead, focused on environmental impacts of the proposed project, as well as fears about the industry’s influence over government decision-makers and democratic accountability, particularly as related to the rights of Indigenous peoples.…”