2002
DOI: 10.1080/00472330280000071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debating rights in Malaysia: Contradictions and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, considerations of health reigned supreme in comparison to those of rights perhaps because the idea of promoting and protecting health is valued more. Also that the modern day concept of human rights is decidedly Western in origin [ 27 ], whereas in Islamic jurisprudence there is the greater onus of social justice, equity and fairness [ 28 ]. Furthermore, the social and cultural context of Malaysia is shaped profoundly by Islam being the predominant religion in Malaysia, which shapes policy [ 29 ], process and also law [ 30 ], as evident in the dual legal system present in Malaysia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, considerations of health reigned supreme in comparison to those of rights perhaps because the idea of promoting and protecting health is valued more. Also that the modern day concept of human rights is decidedly Western in origin [ 27 ], whereas in Islamic jurisprudence there is the greater onus of social justice, equity and fairness [ 28 ]. Furthermore, the social and cultural context of Malaysia is shaped profoundly by Islam being the predominant religion in Malaysia, which shapes policy [ 29 ], process and also law [ 30 ], as evident in the dual legal system present in Malaysia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critics also argued that the ‘ASEAN Way’ emphasizes too much on consensus and quiet diplomacy as opposed to institutionalized rules and direct criticism of individual member states (Haacke, 2003: 59; Eldridge, 2002: 60). ASEAN regimes have refrained from engaging with fellow governments over claims of human rights abuses (Verma, 2002: 114) – the ‘ASEAN Way’ of privileging sovereignty, non-interference, and consensus to the benefit of regimes that are less transparent or accountable but seemingly more effective.…”
Section: Paradigm Debates In Asean: From Old To Neo-communitarianismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three variable approach (Tarrow and Della Porta, 2005) Complex internationalism: expansion of institutions, regimes and norms at the \ The combination of these elements offers an interesting lens to apprehend the growing transnationalization of social activism and protest. Synthesizing their approach, Della Porta and Tarrow write: the combination of rooted cosmopolitans with multiple belongings and flexible identities, working within the structure of complex internationalization, offers new resources and opportunities for transnational social movements.…”
Section: Proposed Explanatory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%