2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Debe incluirse la función pulmonar en la estratificación de riesgo de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica propuesta por GesEPOC?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current recommendations documents have simplified this concept, limiting the assessment of the number of exacerbations during the previous year. Since the number of exacerbations is variable over time, it is not clear whether a patient has stopped having exacerbations due to treatment efficacy or to the natural variability of the disease expression.Another relevant debate is whether lung function should be included in the risk stratification of COPD[51]. The non-consideration of lung function in the follow-up of patients proposed by the GOLD document has been considerable controversy in the scientific community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current recommendations documents have simplified this concept, limiting the assessment of the number of exacerbations during the previous year. Since the number of exacerbations is variable over time, it is not clear whether a patient has stopped having exacerbations due to treatment efficacy or to the natural variability of the disease expression.Another relevant debate is whether lung function should be included in the risk stratification of COPD[51]. The non-consideration of lung function in the follow-up of patients proposed by the GOLD document has been considerable controversy in the scientific community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%