1998
DOI: 10.2307/136203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debt Contracts and Financial Intermediation with Costly Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the equilibrium probability of screening has to increase in order to keep the incentive‐compatibility constraint binding. It should be clear from the explanation here that this result rests primarily on the condition that the equilibrium loan rate for a high‐risk borrower is higher than that for a low‐risk borrower – a rather robust feature of equilibrium contracts that is likely to hold both in theory and in practice (e.g., one can find this feature of contracts in Azariadis and Smith 1993; Bencivenga and Smith 1993; and Wang and Williamson 1998). Since screening leads to wasteful use of resources, to the extent that an increase in τ induces lenders to screen more frequently, a higher income tax will exacerbate the problem of asymmetric information.…”
Section: Equilibrium Loan Contractsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the equilibrium probability of screening has to increase in order to keep the incentive‐compatibility constraint binding. It should be clear from the explanation here that this result rests primarily on the condition that the equilibrium loan rate for a high‐risk borrower is higher than that for a low‐risk borrower – a rather robust feature of equilibrium contracts that is likely to hold both in theory and in practice (e.g., one can find this feature of contracts in Azariadis and Smith 1993; Bencivenga and Smith 1993; and Wang and Williamson 1998). Since screening leads to wasteful use of resources, to the extent that an increase in τ induces lenders to screen more frequently, a higher income tax will exacerbate the problem of asymmetric information.…”
Section: Equilibrium Loan Contractsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It stems from the observation that ex ante screening is arguably more important and more often practiced in the credit market than ex post verification. Theoretically, Wang and Williamson (1998) argue that the costly screening approach has another advantage over the costly state verification model in that debt contracts survive randomization as the optimal contracts in the costly screening model. In our framework, a separating equilibrium as in Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) will emerge, and incentive‐compatible (debt) contracts can be offered so that borrowers are induced to self‐select.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of our analysis is to offer an alternative explanation of stock market development by appealing to a different, but equally plausible, form of informational friction that relates to borrowers' actions in determining project outcomes. In doing this, we pay heed to the view held by many analysts that, in practice, it is the ex ante, rather than the ex post, costs of acquiring information that matter most to lenders (Wang and Williamson, 1998). An implication of our model is that lenders could, in principle, execute loan repayments through a system of contingent claim contracts based on observed project yields.…”
Section: The Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to reduce the cost of raising funds up to its lowest level : this is obtained when = 0 and/or W = R. Consider the valuesĉ andc which appear respectively in (26) and (27). After substituting = 0 and/or W = R intoĉ andc, inequality (28) solvesĉ c.…”
Section: On the Elimination Of The Credit Crunchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of government support in credit provision with …nancial informational frictions has been studied by DeMeza and Webb (1987), Innes (1991) and Hellmann and Stiglitz (2000), inter alii. Williamson (1994) and Wang and Williamson (1998) consider public intervention which eliminates information asymmetries caused by costly state veri…cation. On the other hand, the positive e¤ect of external mediators has been initially examined by Myerson (1986) and Forges (1986) in communication games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%