2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2632009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debt Covenant Renegotiation and Investment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Arnold and Westermann (2015) show that covenant renegotiation may resolve agency cost of debt, including debt overhang. The theory, as is well developed and easily understood, however, has never been directly tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Arnold and Westermann (2015) show that covenant renegotiation may resolve agency cost of debt, including debt overhang. The theory, as is well developed and easily understood, however, has never been directly tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that debt renegotiation can resolve the debt overhang problem is formally modeled in Aivazian andCallen (1980)andGertner andScharfstein (1991), who show that debt renegotiation mitigates underinvestment and restores investment efficiency. More recently, Arnold and Westermann (2015) show that covenant renegotiation may resolve agency cost of debt, including debt overhang. The theory, as is well developed and easily understood, however, has never been directly tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%