Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2166896.2166914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debugging is-a structure in networked taxonomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the debugging component, this work extends the work in [19,18] that dealt with debugging is-a structure in taxonomy networks. These were one of the few approaches dealing with repairing missing is-a structure and in the case of [18] debugging both missing and wrong is-a structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the debugging component, this work extends the work in [19,18] that dealt with debugging is-a structure in taxonomy networks. These were one of the few approaches dealing with repairing missing is-a structure and in the case of [18] debugging both missing and wrong is-a structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…During the recent years several approaches have been proposed for debugging semantic defects in ontologies, such as unsatisfiable concepts or inconsistent ontologies (e.g., [24,14,15,8]) and related to mappings (e.g., [22,11,23,28]) or integrated ontologies [13]. Further, there has been some work on detecting modeling defects (e.g., [9,3]) such as missing relations, and repairing modeling defects [19,18,16]. The increased interest in this field has also led to the creation of an international workshop on this topic [20].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[16,15,29,5]). Modeling defects have mainly been discussed in [2,20,19] for taxonomies, i.e. from a knowledge representation point of view, a simple kind of ontologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%