Artifact Digital Object Group 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3218967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debunking the Myths of Influence Maximization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
155
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly presented by Arora et al [1] there are three main categories of IM algorithms: greedy, sampling and approximation.…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly presented by Arora et al [1] there are three main categories of IM algorithms: greedy, sampling and approximation.…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions: Greedy solutions require hours or days of processing due to the repeated computation of σ M C (S). They perform poorly for seed sets larger than 50 and do not scale to large datasets [1]. Heuristics don't offer theoretical guarantee and often lack in precision.…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Note that ASTI is the version with a batch size of 1.) AdaptIM is modified from the AdaptIM-1 method proposed in [2] [10,33], we set the approximation parameter ε = 0.5 for the five adaptive algorithms. For those parameters in ATEUC, we use the values recommended in [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%