2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0022377817000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debye length and plasma skin depth: two length scales of interest in the creation and diagnosis of laboratory pair plasmas

Abstract: In traditional electron/ion laboratory plasmas, the system size L is much larger than both the plasma skin depth l s and the Debye length λ D . In current and planned efforts to create electron/positron plasmas in the laboratory, this is not necessarily the case. A low-temperature, low-density system may have λ D < L < l s ; a high-density, thermally relativistic system may have l s < L < λ D . Here we consider the question of what plasma physics phenomena are accessible (and/or diagnostically exploitable) in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These frequency is well below the plasma frequency of the companion photosphere, νp 7 × 10 6 ρ 1/2 (X + Y /2) 1/2 GHz, where ρ is the density of the photosphere, and X and Y represent the hydrogen and helium mass fraction, respectively. In this situation plasma behaves has a metal almost entirely reflecting the impinging radiation (see e.g., Stenson et al 2017), which is therefore unable to effectively penetrate the external layers of the companion and power the GQC mechanism. In line with the Goldreich and Julian model (see Goldreich & Julian 1969, Hirotani 2006 and references therein), the remaining power, still of the order of ×10 32 erg s −1 , is emitted in the form of high energy gamma rays and electron-positron relativistic pairs.…”
Section: Gravitation Quadrupole Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These frequency is well below the plasma frequency of the companion photosphere, νp 7 × 10 6 ρ 1/2 (X + Y /2) 1/2 GHz, where ρ is the density of the photosphere, and X and Y represent the hydrogen and helium mass fraction, respectively. In this situation plasma behaves has a metal almost entirely reflecting the impinging radiation (see e.g., Stenson et al 2017), which is therefore unable to effectively penetrate the external layers of the companion and power the GQC mechanism. In line with the Goldreich and Julian model (see Goldreich & Julian 1969, Hirotani 2006 and references therein), the remaining power, still of the order of ×10 32 erg s −1 , is emitted in the form of high energy gamma rays and electron-positron relativistic pairs.…”
Section: Gravitation Quadrupole Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These objects have recently been gathering increasing interest in the academic community, not only for their unique properties (see for instance, Ref. [1]) but also for the major role they play in the dynamics of a wide range of extreme astrophysical objects. For instance, magnetized electronpositron plasmas exist in pulsar magnetospheres [2], in bipolar outflows in active galactic nuclei [3], at the center of our own galaxy [4], and in the early universe [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35.Qz,98.62.Nx The exact symmetry between its positively and negatively charged constituents makes electron-positron plasmas and beams (EPBs) unique cases in plasma physics. For instance, the exact mobility of the two species forbids the excitation of drift and acoustic modes [1], and, more generally, EPBs have a much more simplified Clemmow-Mullaly-Allis diagram than that of their electron-ion counterpart (see, for instance, [2]). EPBs are also believed to play a central role in a range of high-energy astrophysical phenomena, such as the ultra-relativistic outflows from active galactic nuclei and pulsars [3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%