1979
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.42.776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debye-Length Discrimination of Nonlinear Laser Forces Acting on Electrons in Tenuous Plasmas

Abstract: Experimental results are presented which reveal the important role played by nonlinear radiation or ponderomotive forces in laser plasma interactions. The existence of these nonlinear forces are clearly revealed by the properties of tenuous helium plasmas generated by focusing of intense laser beams.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct proof of this is the linear dependence of the fast ion energies on the charge number (which is not explainable by thermokinetics or "hot" electrons), these ions being generated in most cases after ponderomotive self-focusing (Hora 1969b) and the generation of the caviton which was discovered numerically on the basis of the preceding theory (Hora 1969b) by Shearer et al (1970). This caviton generation in numerous experiments was clear evidence of the nonlinear force [see chapter 10 of Hora (1991)], although a direct action has been demonstrated by other experiments (Boreham & Hora 1979;Boreham & Luther-Davies 1979;Baldwin & Boreham 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A direct proof of this is the linear dependence of the fast ion energies on the charge number (which is not explainable by thermokinetics or "hot" electrons), these ions being generated in most cases after ponderomotive self-focusing (Hora 1969b) and the generation of the caviton which was discovered numerically on the basis of the preceding theory (Hora 1969b) by Shearer et al (1970). This caviton generation in numerous experiments was clear evidence of the nonlinear force [see chapter 10 of Hora (1991)], although a direct action has been demonstrated by other experiments (Boreham & Hora 1979;Boreham & Luther-Davies 1979;Baldwin & Boreham 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…One has to realiZe that this result was enforced from our studies of the radial emission of electrons in vacuum (or very low density plasma with a Debye length larger than the diameter of the laser beam) [14] where the electrons are accelerated by the nonlinear force to 100 eVor 1 keY energy at neodymium glass laser intensities of 1015 0r 1016W/cm2respectively (experiments by Boreham and Luther-Davies [14] [294]). This was very easily understood from the ponderomotive part of the nonlinear force from the radial action of the gradient of the decaying square of the electric field where then according to Eq.…”
Section: Exact Gaussian Beam Cluster Injection Laser Amplifier and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having shown how the Boreham experiment (14) led to the exact derivation of the longitudinal field component of laser beams and to the principle of high accuracy for nonlinear physics, there were importaI\t applications of this experiment. One was the first possib1l1ty to measure the tunnel ionization of helium atoms (Baldwin et al1981) confirming the theory of Keldysh (196) immediately expressing the multiphoton ionization process.…”
Section: Exact Gaussian Beam Cluster Injection Laser Amplifier and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Hora and colleagues have also reviewed and contributed to the development of laser field models and their application to electrodynamics-the accuracy principle. 2,[5][6][7] The importance of the physical model of focused laser fields has been clearly demonstrated in direct laserelectron scattering 5,[8][9][10][11][12][13] and must be considered to accurately model any high-intensity experiment. 14 In this Letter we derive an exact analytical series solution to the full Maxwell wave equation for a laser having a flattened Gaussian transverse profile in the focal plane by using the angular spectrum method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%