1993
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/29/6/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decade Designs for Weighings of Non-uniform Variance

Abstract: The selection of an efficient weighing design is a common problem in mass metrology. The calibration of a set of nominally equal masses in terms of one or more reference masses of the same value does not normally present any difficulty, but designs for extending the calibration of a kilogram mass to multiples and submultiples of the unit are more complex. A selection rule that is very widely used is that the design matrix be orthogonal. However, orthogonality is advantageous only when all the weighings in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the former is the orthogonality of the scheme (orthogonality is advantageous only when all the weighings in the design have the same variance [4]). …”
Section: Analysis Of Variances For Multiplication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the former is the orthogonality of the scheme (orthogonality is advantageous only when all the weighings in the design have the same variance [4]). …”
Section: Analysis Of Variances For Multiplication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency is especially useful when comparing the designs involving the same masses and balances, even if the number of mass comparisons is different. It is desirable for the efficiency of a design to be large, as this will indicate that the variances are small [9]. For an efficient scheme, it is advantageous that each mass is used approximately the same number of times and as often as possible.…”
Section: Det Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty. The evaluation of the uncertainty of mass comparisons is described, for example, in Croarkin (1989), Morris (1992), Chapman (1995), Bich et al (1993/94), EA-4/02 (1999), Jones and Schoonover (2002), OIML (2004) and Schwartz et al (2007). For the following short summary of the main input quantities and their contributions, the terminology of the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement' (GUM 1995) and the International Recommendation OIML R 111 ( 2004) is used.…”
Section: Electrostatic and Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%