2020
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1833944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decannulation and improvement of responsiveness in patients with disorders of consciousness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors affirmed that a more accurate assessment of responsiveness and level of consciousness could better predict the probability of decannulation in ABI patients. This evidence was recently confirmed by Hikiki et al [ 21 ], demonstrating that the highest CRS-r scores at admission corresponded to the highest probability of decannulation at discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These authors affirmed that a more accurate assessment of responsiveness and level of consciousness could better predict the probability of decannulation in ABI patients. This evidence was recently confirmed by Hikiki et al [ 21 ], demonstrating that the highest CRS-r scores at admission corresponded to the highest probability of decannulation at discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For this reason, prognostication on neurological outcomes in patients with DoC remains a challenging task. A conspicuous number of predictive parameters in rehabilitation of patients with DoC have been reported both from the clinical world [3]- [5] and the instrumental world [6]- [8]. Multiple electroencephalography (EEG) descriptors as reactivity, alpha waves and an anteroposterior gradient (APG) have been shown to be predictive of a possible consciousness recovery [9]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the fluctuation of the consciousness level itself, some concomitant clinical states, such as aphasia, apraxia, object, or visual agnosia, marked spasticity ( 43 ), and hyper or hypotonus was reported to produce impossible or improbable CRS-R scores ( 44 ). Additionally, some associated pathologies or clinical conditions, such as the presence of a CINMP ( 22 ) or the presence of tracheostomy ( 45 , 46 ), may limit the recognition of voluntary behavior and, consequently, hinder a correct diagnosis of consciousness ( 42 ). This risk of misdiagnosis has serious ethical concerns and deep implications for medical management and the decisions of the patient' families ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%