2015
DOI: 10.4103/1110-9173.157784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decapsulation versus valve reimplantation in cases with an encysted Ahmed valve in refractory glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there is no consensus regarding treatment after failure of AGV implantation because of limited research [2111718]. Al-Mosallamy [18] compared bleb excision (12 patients) and reimplantation of the AGV (13 patients). The failure rate of the bleb excision group was 8.3% and that of the AGV reimplantation group was 15.4%; this difference was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there is no consensus regarding treatment after failure of AGV implantation because of limited research [2111718]. Al-Mosallamy [18] compared bleb excision (12 patients) and reimplantation of the AGV (13 patients). The failure rate of the bleb excision group was 8.3% and that of the AGV reimplantation group was 15.4%; this difference was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the IOP is not controlled using these treatments, additional secondary glaucoma drainage device implantation, cyclophotocoagulation, or encapsulated bleb revision may be performed [231117]. There have been some reports regarding treatment of patients after implantation failure of a glaucoma drainage device, but details on methodology and surgical results of encapsulated bleb revision are limited [1718].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%