Decarbonization of Maritime Transport: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the status and prospects of the decarbonization of maritime transport. Already more than two years have passed since the landmark decision of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in April 2018, which entailed ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships. The paper attempts to address the following three questions: (a) where do we stand with respect to GHG emissions from ships, (b) how is the Initial IMO Strategy progressing, and (c) what should be done to move ahead? To that effect, our methodology includes commenting on some of the key issues addressed by the recently released 4th IMO GHG study, assessing progress at the IMO since 2018, and finally identifying other issues that we consider relevant and important as regards maritime GHG emissions, such as for instance the role of the European Green Deal and how this may interact with the IMO process. Even though the approach of the paper is to a significant extent qualitative, some key quantitative and modelling aspects are considered as well. On the basis of our analysis, our main conjecture is that there is not yet light at the end of the tunnel with respect to decarbonizing maritime transport.

Global Shipping Emissions from a Well-to-Wake Perspective: The MariTEAM Model

“…A comparison of the formulations behind such models was done by Nunes et al 11 and Moreno-Gutiérrez et al 12 followed by a study showing that different models could differ up to 40% in ship emissions. 13 In fact Psaraftis and Kontovas 14 pointed out the high number of assumptions in the IMO GHG studies and the lack of transparency. One of the main concerns is the choice of ship power calculation method, where the simpler Admiralty coefficient, based on adjusting the engine operation to a reference value (load-based), could yield significantly higher emission numbers than more modern methods, based on power prediction models (resistance based), 15 applied in this study.…”

Container fleet renewal considering multiple sulfur reduction technologies and uncertain markets amidst COVID-19

“…Table 3 presents some operating conditions of CPNW and OPNW routes. Some ship navigation data of the two routes were given separately, and used to calculate and set the sailing speed of ships at different levels on each route ( Psaraftis and Kontovas, 2021 ).…”

The Rise of Ultra Large Container Vessels: Implications for Seaport Systems and Environmental Considerations

“…While the EEDI only aims at improving the efficiency of new built ships, MEPC adopted a similar index for the existing fleet, the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) in 2021 to be applied after 2022 (IMO 2021). Both indices, however, have been criticized to only make small contributions towards IMO's decarbonization goals (Trivyza et al 2020;Rutherford et al 2020;Psaraftis and Kontovas 2021). EEDI and EEXI are accompanied by a so-called Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) and the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII).…”