2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-018-3121-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay of Complex-Time Determinantal and Pfaffian Correlation Functionals in Lattices

Abstract: We supplement the determinantal and Pfaffian bounds of [4] for many-body localization of quasi-free fermions, by considering the high dimensional case and complex-time correlations. Our proof uses the analyticity of correlation functions via the Hadamard three-line theorem. We show that the dynamical localization for the one-particle system yields the dynamical localization for the many-point fermionic correlation functions, with respect to the Hausdorff distance in the determinantal case. In [4], a stronger n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where dist(w, V ) := min v∈V |w − v| is the distance between a point w and a set V . This distance was used in [10,11]. In particular [11] extends some results of [43] to higher dimensions, in the D H distance setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where dist(w, V ) := min v∈V |w − v| is the distance between a point w and a set V . This distance was used in [10,11]. In particular [11] extends some results of [43] to higher dimensions, in the D H distance setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This distance was used in [10,11]. In particular [11] extends some results of [43] to higher dimensions, in the D H distance setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the occasion of the extension of part of our results to complex times and higher dimensions [2], J.-B. Bru and W. de Siqueira Pedra made us aware of a missing assumption in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 of [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%