2006
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2006.163.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay of geometry for unimodal maps: An elementary proof

Abstract: We prove that a nonrenormalizable smooth unimodal interval map with critical order between 1 and 2 displays decay of geometry, by an elementary and purely "real" argument. This completes a "real" approach to Milnor's attractor problem for smooth unimodal maps with critical order not greater than 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let DG denote the collection of parameters c for which f c satisfies the decaying geometry condition. We should note that if = 2, F 0 r ⊂ DG (and in fact, the decay is at least exponentially fast, see [14,21,35]). We will first deal with the parameters c ∈ F 0 r \ DG, and show that f c |ω(0) is uniquely ergodic, and there is a unique SRB-measure which is either an acip or the invariant probability measure supported on ω(0).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let DG denote the collection of parameters c for which f c satisfies the decaying geometry condition. We should note that if = 2, F 0 r ⊂ DG (and in fact, the decay is at least exponentially fast, see [14,21,35]). We will first deal with the parameters c ∈ F 0 r \ DG, and show that f c |ω(0) is uniquely ergodic, and there is a unique SRB-measure which is either an acip or the invariant probability measure supported on ω(0).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we state a result which we rely upon considering the finitely renormalizable recurrent case in Section 4. It has been proven in [2] and [11], and establishes the decay of geometry for maps in U 3 . Moreover, the same result is true in U 2 , see [11] and [12].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In Section 4 we consider finitely renormalizable unimodal maps in U 2 and prove that if they are not stabilized then they are not c-structurally stable. The decay of geometry established in [2] and [11] is crucial for our arguments. Then in Section 5 we obtain similar results for infinitely renormalizable maps in U 2 (and even in U ∞ ).…”
Section: Theorem 12 (Kozlovski)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that the cocycle L is uniformly expanding if there exist K > 0 and θ > 1 such that for every (x, v) ∈ E we have (38) |v i | ≥ Kθ i |v| Proof. Of course if L : E → E is uniformly expanding then (39) holds.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%