2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.13707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay of one-dimensional surface modulations

Abstract: The relaxation process of one dimensional surface modulations is reexamined. Surface evolution is described in terms of a standard step flow model. Numerical evidence that the surface slope, D(x, t), obeys the scaling ansatz D(x, t) = α(t)F (x) is provided. We use the scaling ansatz to transform the discrete step model into a continuum model for surface dynamics. The model consists of differential equations for the functions α(t) and F (x). The solutions of these equations agree with simulation results of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption that every surface feature is composed of many steps clearly breaks down on macroscopic facets where there are no steps at all. Thus, existing continuum models fail near singular regions.A possible resolution of this problem is to solve the continuum model in non-singular regions and use matching conditions at the singular facet edges [11][12][13][14]. This is a good solution in extremely simple cases (see, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that every surface feature is composed of many steps clearly breaks down on macroscopic facets where there are no steps at all. Thus, existing continuum models fail near singular regions.A possible resolution of this problem is to solve the continuum model in non-singular regions and use matching conditions at the singular facet edges [11][12][13][14]. This is a good solution in extremely simple cases (see, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not true in Ref. 17, for example: there, the equations of motion for steps 1, 2, N − 1, and N are different due to step-antistep annihilations occurring at the peaks and valleys of 1D periodic corrugations.…”
Section: A Straight Stepsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We take q͑y͒ = ͚ m=0 c m ͑y +1͒ m/2 to be the form of q near the facet edge. 17 ͑The coefficients c m here should not be confused with the terrace adatom densities, c i , used in the main text.͒ In our numerical procedure, we used = 12 and this value gave sufficient accuracy in order to compare with step simulation data. Noting Eq.…”
Section: ͑B1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations