1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.75.1479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay Paths of Interfering Two-Electron Excitations in Helium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
42
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9]. The error bars in the cross sections were estimated to be ±2% for 2 5 , ±10% for 3 5 , and ±15% for 4 5 .…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[9]. The error bars in the cross sections were estimated to be ±2% for 2 5 , ±10% for 3 5 , and ±15% for 4 5 .…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The filled data points are the present experimental results, with the solid curves through the data points representing the fit results. The dashed curves represent the data by Menzel et al [9] and the dashed-dotted curves the results of the R-matrix calculations convoluted with a Gaussian of 6 meV width (FWHM) to simulate finite experimental resolution.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…data [15] on an absolute scale is in general good. Interestingly the cross section in acceleration gauge (dashed) is higher than in velocity gauge (solid) and higher than the experiment for the partial cross section N ′ = 1.…”
Section: B Typical Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 89%