2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decellularized ECM-derived bioinks: Prospects for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although medical devices are commercially available to be impregnated with SNAP molecules, their fabrication based on patients' individual geometry of the pathologic site is advantageous. 3D printing is a layer by layer additive manufacturing process which can create grafts according to the designed 3D CAD model (Kabirian & Mozafari, ). In the current study, fused deposition modeling (FDM) was used as a simple 3D printing method which creates the constructs by extruding and solidifying the polymer according to the CAD model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although medical devices are commercially available to be impregnated with SNAP molecules, their fabrication based on patients' individual geometry of the pathologic site is advantageous. 3D printing is a layer by layer additive manufacturing process which can create grafts according to the designed 3D CAD model (Kabirian & Mozafari, ). In the current study, fused deposition modeling (FDM) was used as a simple 3D printing method which creates the constructs by extruding and solidifying the polymer according to the CAD model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triton X-100 is known to decrease the amount of fibronectin and laminin in the final dECM. Triton-X-100 is known to damage the ultrastructure of the ECM in addition to removal of some glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) [62,66]. Triton X-100 was shown to leave large quantities of cellular material when used for decellularizing the tendon [65,67,68].…”
Section: Decellularization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, dealing with bioinks made of only dECM, providing cells with their natural microenvironment, could represent a further step towards the design of a real tissue-mimicking scaffold. In this context, dECM bioinks have been derived from different organs [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]. The obtainment of dECM-based bioinks for 3D printing involves different steps [ 17 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Moving Towards Biomimetic Engineered Muscular Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the decellularization of the tissue of interest by removing the cells while preserving the ECM. Several physical, chemical, enzymatic and biological processes can be adopted; the selection depends on several factors, such as tissue and organ thickness, density and lipid content [ 20 , 21 ]. To prepare a printable material, dECM needs to be processed as a hydrogel: ECM is usually crushed into a powder form and solubilized in a physiological buffer solution (generally, enzymatic acidic digestion with a pH adjusted to accommodate cells, if to be included in the final formulation) in order to deal with a solution at 10 °C and a gel at 37 °C.…”
Section: Moving Towards Biomimetic Engineered Muscular Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%