Decentering Whiteness in Social Work Curriculum

Abstract

The social work profession has historically been dominated by the presence and perspectives of whiteness. The centering of whiteness in social work education is reflected in course offerings, course content, assignment construction, and inherent racialized assumptions about who clients and social workers will be in practice spaces. Critical race theory (CRT) and liberation theory provide a framework for considering how to make visible the ways in which white supremacy is embedded in social work education, and to identify strategies for disrupting its presence by decentering whiteness. The purpose of this project is to foster critical thought about ways to dismantle racism and white supremacy in social work educational spaces. Using the reflexive methodology of collaborative autoethnography, the four authors - two course instructors and two students - with varying racial identities and positionalities, reflected on the experiences of coming to, being in, and transitioning out of the course. Areas of convergence and divergence in the autoethnographic reflections revealed strategies such as embracing vulnerability, promoting authentic relationships, and normalizing emotional as well as cognitive engagement for decentering whiteness in social work education. Implications and recommendations for social work educators and students committed to engaging in anti-racist practice are also discussed

A Critical Analysis of Standardized Testing in Speech and Language Therapy

“…To conceive the possibilities of what we can become away from the limitations of standardized testing and standardized language ideologies, criticality and reflexivity which includes the process of questioning, debating, and grappling with our current state of being must take place (see Odera et al 2021 for criticality and reflexivity in the context of social work). Could we as practitioners or educators really participate in a racist practice that deliberately oppresses minoritized communities for economic profit?…”

A New World Cannot be Built Alone: An Abolitionist Framework for Collective Action in Social Work

“…These policies uphold white supremacy in education as they legally require a narrow teaching of history and current events. Further, they limit the perspectives and voices that are allowed in both P-12 and higher education, instead centering whiteness (Schwartz, 2023;Odera et al, 2021). Without the ability to think critically about the impact of policies on society, it becomes difficult, though not impossible, to challenge racist policies, like the ones outlined below, that seek to legalize oppression.…”

“…States with anti-trans and anti-CRT laws limit the recruitment and hasten the departure of highly skilled, talented, knowledgeable faculty as scholars of marginalized identities or those who conduct research on marginalized populations may be less inclined to work in an environment that is combative to their identities and scholarship (Kumar & Hodgson, 2023). This is a planned outcome from those shutting down DEI (Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion) efforts as it results in the homogeneity of instructor identities and perspectives (Odera et al, 2021;Cox & Greene, 2018). Therefore, these policies ultimately deny social work students a diverse faculty from which to learn, while also failing to educate them on critical concepts that they will need to engage in order to provide social work services that are reflective of our profession's stated goals and values.…”

Confronting Social Work Worldviews: Ubuntu and Procedural Research Ethics with Persons Experiencing Refugee Status

“…Therefore, social work researchers must critically interrogate both their individual and collective actions to redress the Eurocentric ethics, theories, and methodologies embedded in social work research and practice. Individually, social work researchers should consider decentering themselves in their research, being self-reflexive, and learning about the realities of those who face subjugation (Odera et al, 2021). Collectively, we must push back on the neoliberal confines of social work research (Hanesworth, 2017).…”