2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2005.00350.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralised bargaining of working time in the German automotive industry

Abstract: The article addresses the question whether or not the trend towards the decentralisation of collective bargaining on working time in Germany entails a loss in the binding power of industry-level agreements. To this end, both working-time agreements and practices are examined at the firm or establishment level in the automotive industry. Additionally, the article examines the extent to which workplace micro-level changes are reflected in official statistics. The findings indicate that unions and works councils … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if there may be a spectre of 'internal erosion' involving a shift of regulation from industrial to company level, as has occurred in Germany (Haipeter and Lehndorff, 2005), large-scale 'external erosion' (declining union membership) is unlikely in the Nordic countries. Furthermore, though the erosion of Modell Deutschland has been associated with works council representatives agreeing concessions which contravene collective agreements (Whittall, 2005), the presumption in the Nordic context is the enduring involvement of union representatives in both collective bargaining and codetermination processes.…”
Section: Workplace Bargaining In Finlandmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if there may be a spectre of 'internal erosion' involving a shift of regulation from industrial to company level, as has occurred in Germany (Haipeter and Lehndorff, 2005), large-scale 'external erosion' (declining union membership) is unlikely in the Nordic countries. Furthermore, though the erosion of Modell Deutschland has been associated with works council representatives agreeing concessions which contravene collective agreements (Whittall, 2005), the presumption in the Nordic context is the enduring involvement of union representatives in both collective bargaining and codetermination processes.…”
Section: Workplace Bargaining In Finlandmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Haipeter and Lehndorff (2005) have also investigated whether German works councils have become agents of the erosion of the industrial relations system, with the evident shift of regulatory competences from industry to the workplace level. Are Nordic codetermination committees, arising from cooperation within undertakings, up to their task in this competence shift?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take Germany again as an example, two-thirds of companies apply some form of working-time flexibility beyond overtime, and two-thirds of them have introduced these working-time forms since the mid-1990s (employers survey, see Haipeter and Lehndorff 2005).…”
Section: Second Challenge: Irregularity and Flexibility Of Working Hoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the particular characteristic of fitting working hours to needs without the need for lay-offs or hiring. The WTAs modality is being increasingly used in some countries because it allows staff stability to be combined with flexible use of working times by companies (Haipeter and Lehndorff, 2005).…”
Section: Definition Of the Wtas And Handf Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%