Decentralising NCD management in rural southern Africa: evaluation of a pilot implementation study

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and associated morbidity and mortality, is increasing rapidly in low and middle-income countries where health systems often have limited access and lower quality of care. The intervention was to decentralise uncomplicated non-communicable disease (NCD) care from a hospital to nurse practitioners in health centres in a poor rural district in Eswatini, southern Africa. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of decentralised care for NCDs within nurse-led clinics in order improve access and inform healthcare planning in Eswatini and similar settings. Methods: In collaboration with the Eswatini Ministry of Health, we developed and implemented a package of interventions to support nurse-led delivery of care, including: clinical desk-guide for hypertension and diabetes, training modules, treatment cards and registries and patient leaflets. Ten community clinics in the Lubombo Region of Eswatini were randomly selected to be trained to deliver NCD care for a period of 18 months. Observational data on follow-up rates, blood pressure (BP), glucose etc. were recorded and evaluated. We compared blood pressure and blood glucose measurements between the first and fourth visits and fitted a linear mixed effects model. Results: One thousand one hundred twenty-five patients were recruited to the study. Of these patients, 573 attended for at least 4 appointments. There was a significant reduction in mean BP among hypertensive patients after four visits of 9.9 mmHg systolic and 4.7 mmHg diastolic (p = 0.01), and a non-significant reduction in fasting blood glucose among diabetic patients of 1.2 mmol/l (p = 0.2). Key components of NCD care were completed consistently by nurses throughout the intervention period, including a trend towards patients progressing from monotherapy to dual therapy in accordance with prescribing guidelines. Conclusions: The findings suggest that management of diabetes and hypertension care in a rural district setting can be safely delivered by nurses in community clinics according to a shared care protocol. Improved access is likely to lead to improved patient compliance with treatment.

Integrating hypertension and HIV care in Namibia: A quality improvement collaborative approach

“…facilities. Policy changes to enable nurse-led HTN treatment in SSA have been considered [51], and several pilot studies have explored the feasibility of nurse-led delivery models with encouraging results [52][53][54][55]. Should nurse-led models find broad acceptance, steady attention to quality of care remains paramount [51,56].…”

mHealth guideline training for non-communicable diseases in primary care facilities in Nigeria: a mixed methods pilot study

“…Using a similar shared care guide for management of diabetes and hypertension care in Eswatini (southern Africa), nurses were able to successfully deliver diabetes and hypertension care with improvements in physiological parameters, although continued training and supervision were required to consolidate change. 14 A similar NCD guideline and training COMDIS-HSD partner initiative in Pakistan was found to be effective in trials and was scaled across the Punjab Province of 110 million population. [16][17][18][19][20] This Nigeria pilot adds evidence for the potential in a West African setting and for mHealth as an alternative to expensive residential courses, which is a major constraint to NCD care scale-up.…”

Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol

“…8 Traditionally, management of patients with diabetes in SSA is carried out in health facilities which are often congested, distant from patients' location and where these patients have to wait for long hours to access care. 9 Care delivery for uncomplicated cases and low-risk groups in the community could result in fewer clinic visits, not having to travel long distances, not waiting in queues, and freeing up medical services in the facility for complicated cases and high-risk groups like pregnant women. 10 Community-based care refers to interventions delivered outside of health facilities, in contrast to facility-based care which is delivered or based in clinics or hospitals.…”