Decentralization and district development planning in Zimbabwe

Abstract

One of the most important dimensions of rural development policy in Zimbabwe since independence has been rural local government reform, in particular decentralization policy. Evidence from a number of recent studies is used to present a comprehensive review of Zimbabwe's experience of local government decentralization during the first eight years of independence, 1980 to 1988. Section 2 presents a brief outline of some basic concepts on decentralization which have guided the discussion. Section 3 contains a short account of the local government system inherited from the colonial era. Section 4 outlines the major post‐independence reforms, that is: the 1980 District Councils Act; the 1984‐85 Prime Minister's Directive on Decentralization; the 1985 Provincial Councils and Administration Act; and the 1988 Rural District Councils Act. Section 5 presents an assessment of these reforms, paying particular attention to organizational, financial and planning issues. While some important improvements have been achieved in rural Communal Areas‐in particular the extension of services and increases in local revenues and popular participation‐the system of local government and administration remains a dual one. Other problems include the gap between the planning and budgeting processes, continued financial dependence of district councils on central government, and a lack of serious effort by central government to make use of provincial and district development plans.

Why are lions killing us? Human–wildlife conflict and social discontent in Mbire District, northern Zimbabwe

“…2011). And although decentralisation in the late 1950s resulted in chief-led African Councils (Mutizwa-Mangiza 1990; Chatiza 2010), their history of co-optation and collaboration caused chiefs to be distrusted by their subjects and the liberation movements' fighters during Zimbabwe's struggle for independence. As paid government employees, chiefs were considered sympathetic to the Rhodesian government (Kriger 1988).…”

‘We do not have chiefs who are disabled’: disability, development and culture in a continuing complex emergency

“…In the 1950s the indigenous Tonga population was forcibly removed by the colonial administration from the fertile flood plain of the Zambezi to higher, arid, infertile, land in preparation for the building of the Kariba dam. Following Zimbabwe's own liberation struggle that led to 758 E. Munsaka and H. Charnley independence, both from the British and from internal white rule, in 1980, postindependence policies of decentralisation were designed to facilitate greater autonomy at district level (Mutizwa-Mangiza 1990). But Binga has remained marginalised in a country dominated by Shona (92%) and Ndebele (14%) ethnic groups and, in response to demonstrations of resilience in pursuing human rights claims and efforts to improve their social and economic status, the people of Binga have experienced continuing political harassment (Conyers and Cumanzala 2004).…”

Intergovernmental planning and budgeting in Zimbabwe: learning the lessons of the past

“…As a result, the production of short-and long-term plans was considered in the 1990s to be a 'barren ritual' as very few of the proposed projects in any year are budgeted for, funded or subsequently implemented (Mutizwa-Mangiza 1990). This picture still prevailing under the 2013 Constitution.…”