2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02686198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
222
0
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
222
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These two indicators illustrate that the basic service performance of family planning programs in Empat Lawang regency is still weak and insufficient. Political autonomy measures the discretionary power in political decision making awarded to each district [5]. For Empat Lawang Regency, as the result of local election, the Regent is the person who had the most power in policy and decision making in all aspects of administration including family planning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two indicators illustrate that the basic service performance of family planning programs in Empat Lawang regency is still weak and insufficient. Political autonomy measures the discretionary power in political decision making awarded to each district [5]. For Empat Lawang Regency, as the result of local election, the Regent is the person who had the most power in policy and decision making in all aspects of administration including family planning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, federalism is seen as an important means of control. In line with research on federalism, the degrees of decentralisation as well as effective sub-national fiscal autonomy are incorporated into the measure (Schneider, 2003).…”
Section: Mutual Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To start with, the main problem of the literature is actually not the choice between "centralized" and "decentralized" governments, but rather between political, or constitutional (which in turn may refer to the autonomy of decisionmaking, autonomous appointment of governments and their ability to participate in federal decision-making), and administrative (which mostly refers to the construction of public administration, i.e. deconcentration of bureaucracy) decentralization (Hutchcroft, 2001;Ali, 2002;Schneider, 2003). For a large country (in terms of population or territory)…”
Section: Measuring the Degree Of Decentralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the obvious importance of the topic, the literature explicitly comparing different dimensions of decentralization is very small (Treisman, 2002;Schneider, 2003;Blume and Voigt, 2008) and mostly focuses on international settings. A related analysis is done by Liu (2007), who performs a cluster analysis of different dimensions of decentralization in order to identify the typical combinations empirically observed, and Falleti (2004) in a case study of Latin American countries, who investigates the dynamic interaction of different decentralization aspects.…”
Section: Measuring the Degree Of Decentralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%