2021
DOI: 10.3390/risks9090165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments

Abstract: Under the growing complexity of manufacturing processes, supply chains, markets and stakeholder expectations, enterprise risk management (ERM) has become an extremely important, probably yet still underdeveloped, management function. Enterprise risk management theory and practice should keep pace with the changes of rapidly changing environments, through new, more adaptive approaches. The article presents some of the results of a longitudinal survey at Eastern-European manufacturing organizations made on risk … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk management, that is making decisions and carrying out actions aimed at achieving an acceptable level of risk by an entity, referred to as risk appetite (see more: Bakos & Dumitrașcu, 2021;Korombel, 2017) should constitute an integral part of business management regardless of the size of the business (Meshkova et al, 2018). Risk management involves, in particular, identifying potential events or situations to which an entity is exposed, estimating their impact and likelihood of occurrence, identifying and applying proper responses, and monitoring risks (Czerwińska & Jajuga, 2016;Korombel, 2013), as it is a process rather than a one-off action allowing to continuously adjust the level of risk to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk management, that is making decisions and carrying out actions aimed at achieving an acceptable level of risk by an entity, referred to as risk appetite (see more: Bakos & Dumitrașcu, 2021;Korombel, 2017) should constitute an integral part of business management regardless of the size of the business (Meshkova et al, 2018). Risk management involves, in particular, identifying potential events or situations to which an entity is exposed, estimating their impact and likelihood of occurrence, identifying and applying proper responses, and monitoring risks (Czerwińska & Jajuga, 2016;Korombel, 2013), as it is a process rather than a one-off action allowing to continuously adjust the level of risk to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enterprise networks are getting more and more decentralized as a result of how IT services are used nowadays [9]. It is frequently impractical to detect location or have similar network-based access controls in placefor cloud-based services as it was previously [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…达地区的贫困方面被认为具有更大的潜力 [4] 。传统 农业生产效率低下, 难以支持乡村地区的进一步发 展 [5] , 旅游业被认为更适合无其他增长选择而旅游 资源丰富的欠发达农村社区 [6] , 将发展旅游产业作 收稿日期: 2022-01-25; 修订日期: 2022-04-11 基金项目: 国家社会科学基金项目 (17BGL123) 。 作者简介: 黄泰, 男, 江苏丰县人, 教授, 博导, 主要研究方向为城乡发展与旅游规划。E-mail: huangtai_fx@163.com 通讯作者: 卫嫚, 女, 安徽合肥人, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为旅游规划与管理。E-mail: weimango@foxmail.com 2022 年 9 月 黄 泰等: 欠发达地区旅游脱贫后返贫风险及防控机制 http://www.resci.cn 为主要扶贫手段是其脱贫攻坚的重要举措 [7] , 也可 实现乡村农户的脱贫致富 [8] 。然而, 由于旅游业自 身的脆弱性, 旅游扶贫的效用在欠发达地区脱贫实 践中仍具有不均衡、 不充分的表现 [9] 。例如, 陈超凡 等 [10] 以罗霄山片区为例, 研究发现旅游扶贫效率较 低, 旅游业发展对经济增长和脱贫致富的推动作用 并不理想。徐少癸等 [11] 以广西边境民族地区为例, 发现旅游扶贫绩效呈逐步衰退趋势, 且空间分布的 极化趋势显著。何静等 [12] 以西南地区 136 个国家级 贫困县为例, 揭示了旅游扶贫脱贫的不稳定性和空 间差异性。穆学青等 [13] 以云南 25 个边境县 (市) 为 例, 证实经济基础、 产业结构、 交通、 市场需求规模 以及政府干预是其旅游扶贫提升的主要驱动力。 从负面效应视角, 谢双玉等 [14] 发现旅游发展增加了 贫困农户经济成本, 扶贫呈现出 "扶强不扶弱" 的现 象; 段伟等 [15] 发现生态旅游形式的自然保护区会削 弱社会资本, 从而导致农户多维贫困。因此, 旅游 脱贫后如何有效阻断返贫风险成为学术界研究的 热点问题之一。国外多基于贫困动态学与脆弱性 视角, 强调贫困的长期性和持续性, 将返贫风险纳 入贫困体系进行研究 [16,17] 。国内对旅游脱贫后的返 贫研究主要集中在旅游脱贫后的返贫成因、 返贫风 险评估和防控预警等内容。其中, 在返贫成因上, 多基于生计资本视角和突发事件等视角 [18,19] , 认为 返贫是脱贫者内生动力不足以抵抗内外冲击的多 维因素结果。在返贫风险评估上, 主要以可持续生 计框架构建指标体系测度返贫风险 [18] 。在返贫风险 防控预警上, 学者们通常根据返贫成因提出具体防 控建议和预警机制 [20] 。在研究方法上, 以定性方法 为主, 仅少量研究利用多维贫困综合指数 [21] 、 层次分 析法与主成分分析法 [22] 公认水平下的可能性 [23] 。将脆弱性引入到返贫风险 领域中, 可以通过量化脆弱性来评估脱贫家庭未来 再次陷入贫困的概率 [24][25][26][27] 。因此, 本文基于脆弱性 的贫困测度理论, 构建欠发达地区旅游脱贫后的评 估框架及返贫风险防控机理。在脆弱性量化方法 中, 预期贫困的脆弱性模型 (Vulnerability as Expected Poverty, VEP)不仅解决了面板数据和高频数据 获取的难度, 而且允许事先测量脆弱性水平, 本文采 用该方法来测算返贫风险数值。借鉴以往研究 [28,29] 成果和经验, 依据测度的返贫风险数值, 以 0.5 为阈 值, 将农户家庭状态划分为脆弱性脱贫家庭和稳定 性脱贫家庭, 即在下一个时期有 50%的概率陷入贫 困时, 该农户或家庭具有脆弱性。 全面风险管理理论强调从整体入手, 注重全面 管理和全过程管理 [30]…”
unclassified