2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nahs.2020.100912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized switched model-based predictive control for distributed large-scale systems with topology switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as these interconnections get more intricate and the scale of plants gets larger, implementing traditional centralized and decentralized control techniques becomes an uphill task due to the nature of large-scale plants having complex nonlinear dynamics on top of being computationally tiresome to solve, lacking flexibility, and having poor error tolerance . Although process integration improves the operational efficiency of process plants, the large recycling of material and energy that naturally occurs in networked process systems also has an ugly side manifested in the form of time-scale multiplicity in system dynamics. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as these interconnections get more intricate and the scale of plants gets larger, implementing traditional centralized and decentralized control techniques becomes an uphill task due to the nature of large-scale plants having complex nonlinear dynamics on top of being computationally tiresome to solve, lacking flexibility, and having poor error tolerance . Although process integration improves the operational efficiency of process plants, the large recycling of material and energy that naturally occurs in networked process systems also has an ugly side manifested in the form of time-scale multiplicity in system dynamics. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent control approach is that of clustering (Ding et al, 2016;Fele et al, 2017;Barreiro-Gomez et al, 2019;Ahandani et al, 2020), which allows dynamic cooperation between time-varying groups of local controllers. Indeed, system partitioning can be considered an offline clustering problem where subsystems are grouped most efficiently according to a given criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Switching topologies, often combined with the design of MPC algorithms, have been studied to account for varying characteristics of the network. [29][30][31][32] Another recently developed approach, named coalitional control, 33,34 is based on the following idea: assuming the network divided into nonoverlapping clusters, each agent accepts to belong to a given cluster until this guarantees it an economic benefit. With specific reference to the clustering of power networks, many other contributions have been proposed, 20,23,[35][36][37] including sparsity-promoting optimization algorithms for damping the interarea oscillations in power networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches rely on social network community detection, 24,25 game theory, 26 or Page Rank 27,28 . Switching topologies, often combined with the design of MPC algorithms, have been studied to account for varying characteristics of the network 29‐32 . Another recently developed approach, named coalitional control , 33,34 is based on the following idea: assuming the network divided into nonoverlapping clusters, each agent accepts to belong to a given cluster until this guarantees it an economic benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%