2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Weighted Sum Rate maximization in MIMO-OFDMA femtocell networks

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a decentralized strategy for downlink interference management in overlaid MIMO femtocell-macrocell deployments operating in the same band under OFDMA access. The resource allocation, consisting of MIMO precoders at the macro base station (MBS) and femto access points (FAPs) and possibly the resource block (RB) assignment, is designed to maximize the Weighted Sum Rate (WSR) of the system. Being the overall problem non-convex, we propose to solve it in a decentralized way where each transmitt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that with an entirely asynchronous iteration (simultaneous optimizations) convergence could not be guaranteed because the objective function of problem (P s frame ) in (15) could oscillate when the interference-cost matrices were updated. In that case, some works have shown through simulations that convergence is achieved by performing simultaneous optimizations provided that a memory is included in the interference-cost matrices (as, for instance, through a low pass filter), see [25], [32].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that with an entirely asynchronous iteration (simultaneous optimizations) convergence could not be guaranteed because the objective function of problem (P s frame ) in (15) could oscillate when the interference-cost matrices were updated. In that case, some works have shown through simulations that convergence is achieved by performing simultaneous optimizations provided that a memory is included in the interference-cost matrices (as, for instance, through a low pass filter), see [25], [32].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition of (15) Let us define the interference-cost (or price) matrices [24], [25] related to the impact of selecting user i k at SC k in transmit direction d=DL and d=UL, respectively, over the neighboring SCs/users (∀l =k, ∀j l ∈I l ): …”
Section: Joint User Scheduling Precoding Design Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a great interest has been sparked in developing distributed methods. In [10][11][12], the problem is solved in distributed ways based on the pricing mechanism. However, the method in [10] splits the channel allocation process with beamforming and power optimization, and both methods in [11,12] are restricted to single user per cell scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10][11][12], the problem is solved in distributed ways based on the pricing mechanism. However, the method in [10] splits the channel allocation process with beamforming and power optimization, and both methods in [11,12] are restricted to single user per cell scenario. In [13], the method iterative coordinated beamforming (ICBF) makes use of the necessary optimality condition for the WSRMax to design distributed solutions without completed theoretical proofs, and its results elucidate that the coordination can provide considerable gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms use cognitive radio and game theory to support their resource allocation methodologies. The work in [8] aims to maximize the weighted sum rate of the femtomacro network in a delay tolerant scenario. However, this requires high information overhead among MBSs and FBSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%