2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-3819-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deceptive review detection using labeled and unlabeled data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital forensics, including multimedia forensics, is an increasingly important research focus due to the digitalization of our society [1,9,16]. This is also evidenced by the work of Yang et al [21], and Azfar et al [3] in this special issue.…”
Section: Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Digital forensics, including multimedia forensics, is an increasingly important research focus due to the digitalization of our society [1,9,16]. This is also evidenced by the work of Yang et al [21], and Azfar et al [3] in this special issue.…”
Section: Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the identification technology of spammers has been extensively studied. According to different areas, the current research areas on spammer identification technologies can be divided into the e-mail field, the field of social networks, the field of news media, the e-commerce field [20]- [22]. According to different research methods, it can be divided into spammer identification technologies based on user behavioral features, semantic features, and environmental features [28], [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques use different features. These can be divided into two main groups: features related to the review and features related to the reviewer (Jindal and Liu 2007;Li et al 2011;Rout et al 2017). Some previous work singles out quantity, specificity, diversity, non-immediacy, as well as task specific features such as affect, expressivity, complexity, uncertainty, and informality (Zhou et al 2004;Fuller et al 2006).…”
Section: Review Spam Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%