Deciding on justice: environmental justice in city council agenda-setting

Mistur, Evan; Reyes, Ariadna; Soni, Anmol; Boukhaima, Hanan; Newton, Josh

doi:10.1080/13549839.2023.2184783

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 70 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, some scholars have endorsed the use of the multiple-streams framework in comparative policy research. They suggested important points that should be amended or combined with aspects of other approaches to provide a more accurate and more powerful depiction of policymaking reality (Mistur et al, 2023;Siddiki & Curley, 2022). The official actor's role are to formulate policies in the parliamentary system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The policy window opens, and stakeholders manage the meeting, managed by policy entrepreneurs who can bring together the three streams to form the agenda (Mistur et al, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…as it involves actors influencing each other's dominant perceptions of a problem(García-Tejeda & Vieira-Silva, 2023;Mistur et al, 2023) (Valle-Cruz et al, 2020). have proposed three approaches to analyze the agenda-setting process: (1) Moving from problem definition to a complex process, (2) Taking a critical stance on the alleged objectivity of social problems, (3) Emphasizing the role of power, and (4) political manipulation in problem definition and agendasetting.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Conflict Resolution as A Game: The Government's Policy Agenda has Been Neglected Through Negotiation and Compensation

Angin,

Manggala

2024

RGSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This research examines how official actors play a role in resolving conflicts between the farming community and the cement company. Method: This qualitative research focuses on farmers in Puger District affected by PT Imasco Asiatic's irrigation canal closure, as well as community leaders. In-depth interviews will be conducted with participants, and data will be confirmed using GIS for accuracy. GIS is used to verify the accuracy of the information. Result and Discussion: Commodity factories in Indonesia have refused to implement the government's policy agenda and instead negotiated with the Water User Farmers Association (HIPPA) and provided compensation. Both official and unofficial parties, including community and religious leaders, tried to resolve the conflict, but HIPPA, without deliberation, agreed to accept compensation. The change in attitude of the Puger Kulon farming community made the government's struggle meaningful. The role of actors in the policy process is complex, with each actor competing to open policy windows and influence the agenda-setting stage. Implication of the Research: This research contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into conflict resolution between government companies and citizens. On the other hand, highlighting the role of actors in the policy process is complex, with each actor competing to open policy windows and influence the agenda-setting stage. Originality/Value: Official actors (government) dominate in policy making. However, the government has no coercive power since there is a non-official group (outside government) that has negotiated and changed the behavior of farmers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The policy window opens, and stakeholders manage the meeting, managed by policy entrepreneurs who can bring together the three streams to form the agenda (Mistur et al, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Conflict Resolution as A Game: The Government's Policy Agenda has Been Neglected Through Negotiation and Compensation

Angin,

Manggala

2024

RGSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mixing and matching: Intra‐stream interdependence in the multiple streams framework and the adoption of policy mixes

Soni,

Mistur

2024

Policy Studies Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policy process literature offers several frameworks and theories to understand the adoption or modification of policies across different jurisdictions. Extant studies focus on the emergence of coalitions, actors, strategies, etc. as they relate to individual policies. Policy actions, however, are typically deployed as packages—combinations of different instruments or measures. Policy mixes—also used interchangeably with terms such as policy packaging, policy bundling, etc.—are an important aspect of policy design. However, the role and emergence of policy mixes in the context of the policy process have not been studied in great depth. This study examines the role of different policy pathways that yield desired policy outcomes in the electric vehicle (EV) policy subsystem. We use the case of sub‐national EV policies across the US to analyze how different combinations of policy actions operate in combination and/or competition with each other to achieve the desired policy objectives. The study contributes to the policy design scholarship in two ways. First, by analyzing the emergence of policy mixes as policy outputs during the policy design process using a theoretical lens applying the multiple streams framework. Second, by deploying fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a methodological tool to uncover causal pathways to desired policy outcomes.

show abstract

Deciding on justice: environmental justice in city council agenda-setting

Cited by 2 publications

References 70 publications

Conflict Resolution as A Game: The Government's Policy Agenda has Been Neglected Through Negotiation and Compensation

Conflict Resolution as A Game: The Government's Policy Agenda has Been Neglected Through Negotiation and Compensation

Mixing and matching: Intra‐stream interdependence in the multiple streams framework and the adoption of policy mixes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About