2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002jb001983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering shallow paleomagnetic inclinations: 2. Implications from Late Cretaceous strata overlapping the Insular/Intermontane Superterrane boundary in the southern Canadian Cordillera

Abstract: Significant discrepancies exist between paleomagnetic and geologic estimates of the timing and magnitude of terrane displacement in the southern Canadian Cordillera. Lithostratigraphic, palynological, geochronologic, geochemical, and structural data, to which we add paleomagnetic data, demonstrate that Upper Cretaceous strata in Churn Creek are laterally equivalent facies of the Silverquick/Powell Creek (SPC) succession. These rocks therefore comprise a single overlap sequence linking the Insular and Intermont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, evidence from Upper Cretaceous strata overlying the Spences Bridge arc requires an even larger southerly displacement between 104 and 95 Ma. These Upper Cretaceous strata are geologically and paleomagnetically correlative with the Silverquick/Powell Creek succession of the Insular Superterrane [ Enkin et al , 2003]. Paleomagnetic analysis of these strata requires that the composite Insular/Intermontane Superterrane was at the latitude of central Mexico at 95 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, evidence from Upper Cretaceous strata overlying the Spences Bridge arc requires an even larger southerly displacement between 104 and 95 Ma. These Upper Cretaceous strata are geologically and paleomagnetically correlative with the Silverquick/Powell Creek succession of the Insular Superterrane [ Enkin et al , 2003]. Paleomagnetic analysis of these strata requires that the composite Insular/Intermontane Superterrane was at the latitude of central Mexico at 95 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent methods, such as paleoclimatic analysis, geological correlation, paleontologic reconstructions and sedimentary provenance studies, usually provide compatible results that support paleomagnetic interpretations. In this paper and its companion [ Enkin et al , 2003], we present a case where paleomagnetic and geologic stratigraphic correlations coincide, yet the paleogeographic implications of the calculated paleomagnetic latitudes disagree with interpretation of geological constraints and plate motions. Resolution of this dichotomy has proven elusive, and requires an objective reappraisal of paleogeographic constraints provided by both paleomagnetic and geological methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Schmidt & Williams 1995;Sohl et al 1999, Geological Society of America Data Repository item) yielded a direction of D ¼ 208.38 and I ¼ 2 12.98 (a 95 ¼ 4.28), indicating a palaeopole at 43.78S, 359.38E (dp ¼ 2.18, dm ¼ 4.28) and a palaeolatitude of 6.5 + 2.28. The following observations indicate only minor compaction-related inclination shallowing (Williams 2008;Williams et al 2008): (i) the typical shallow inclination of the Elatina palaeomagnetic remanence obtained for samples of different lithologies (fine-, medium-and coarse-grained sandstone, with mudstone and muddy diamictite being avoided); (ii) the comparable inclinations determined for samples from flat-lying strata in the condensed succession on the cratonic platform and from folded strata in basinal successions; and (iii) the low anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (mean ,4% for 65 samples), which indicates only slight magnetic foliation (Enkin et al 2003). The findings are supported by a palaeolatitude of 8.4 þ 6.2/-5.78 determined for the immediately preglacial Yaltipena Fm.…”
Section: Palaeolatitude and Palaeogeographymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…How such a significant tectonic boundary could be cryptic remains unclear [54,55], but the answer may lie in resolving the significant post-150 Ma translations that have occurred within the orogen. Paleomagnetic data implies that large portions of the orogen underwent significant midCretaceous southerly displacements [57], coeval with fold and thrust belt formation within the foreland, widespread dextral strike-slip faulting and voluminous granitic magmatism as far inboard as the eastern limit of Selwyn basin [58]. Paleomagnetic data from Late Cretaceous strata require significant northward translations, relative to the autochthon [59,60] coeval with fold and thrust belt formation in the foreland and oroclinal buckling of the ribbon continent in Alaska [55].…”
Section: Accretionary Orogensmentioning
confidence: 99%