Deciphering the Code: Evidence for a Sociometric DNA in Design Thinking Meetings

Kohl, Steffi; Graus, Mark P.; Lemmink, J.G.A.M.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_7

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This will help us better understand the interplay of social signals and modes with regard to team performance. Lastly, prior analysis of this data set revealed a "sociometric DNA" within the modes expressed as structural differences in the patterns of the individual modes [17]. We believe that understanding how these differences link to performance is the next step toward understanding and improving social signals in team communication.…”

Section: Methods 31 Data Setmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…We aim to investigate team-level performance within a collaborative product development task using a data set published earlier [17]. We chose this data set for several reasons.…”

Section: Methods 31 Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These signals, hereinafter referred to as features, include turn taking, activity levels, and proximity within the network [27]. Prior work [17] focuses on features that capture the rotation of nonverbal behavior in teams. That research assessed the predictability of design thinking mode using five different rotation features: rotating leadership (RL), rotating contributions (RC), turn taking (TTK), successful interruptions (SI), and unsuccessful interruptions (UI).…”

Section: Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Betweenness centrality is calculated by dividing the times a node in a network is located on the shortest path by the total number of paths. RL represents the changes within the centrality by counting the number of local maxima and minima over time for a person [17,18]. This is described in the equation below, where the superscript BC indicates that the local minima and maxima are for the betweenness centrality curve, and i indicates the person.…”

Section: Rotating Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scholars in these domains have investigated human proxemic and paralinguistic behavior since the 1920s. The utilization of paralinguistic and proxemic modalities has shown to vary across tasks, and some studies have found a structural difference between communication patterns in teams during different CCPS tasks [14,17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Zooming in on the Effect of Sociometric Signals on Different Stages of the Design Process

Kohl

Schröder

Graus

et al. 2022

Creativity and Cognition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User

show abstract

Section: Methods 31 Data Setmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…We aim to investigate team-level performance within a collaborative product development task using a data set published earlier [17]. We chose this data set for several reasons.…”

Section: Methods 31 Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rotating Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations