2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the binding of the TWIST1/E12 complex to regulatory E-box sequences

Abstract: The TWIST1 bHLH transcription factor controls embryonic development and cancer processes. Although molecular and genetic analyses have provided a wealth of data on the role of bHLH transcription factors, very little is known on the molecular mechanisms underlying their binding affinity to the E-box sequence of the promoter. Here, we used an in silico model of the TWIST1/E12 (TE) heterocomplex and performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of its binding to specific (TE-box) and modified E-box sequences. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 3-D structure of TWIST1 has not been solved, transcription factors with available elucidated 3-D structures that share high sequence similarity with TWIST1 can be served as applicable models for TWIST1 structure prediction. Using this strategy, previous study has modeled the dimerization of TWIST1 DNA binding domain with E2A, together with the E-Box DNA target 31 ( Supplementary Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the 3-D structure of TWIST1 has not been solved, transcription factors with available elucidated 3-D structures that share high sequence similarity with TWIST1 can be served as applicable models for TWIST1 structure prediction. Using this strategy, previous study has modeled the dimerization of TWIST1 DNA binding domain with E2A, together with the E-Box DNA target 31 ( Supplementary Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p.F191S mutation impairs the E2A/Twist1 transcriptional activity but not E2A/Twist1 interaction. Previously, the E2A-dependent Twist1 transcriptional activity has been characterized through both biochemical assay and computational analysis 19,31 . In order to know whether our mutation influences the transcriptional activity, we employed the E-box promoter assay 31,37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on recent findings [4], we studied the particular involvement of the (1), (1*), (−1) and (−1*) DNA bases in the establishment of H-bond interactions between the wild-type or R154P mutated TE complex and the E-box sequence (Fig. 5a, b and c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using MD simulations and biochemical assays, we and others also highlighted the pivotal function of the R118H/Q/C, R120P, S144R, and K145E/Q residues in the molecular binding of the TE complex [4, 1012, 18, 23, 28, 32, 33]. Mutations affecting these residues, as observed in SCS, lead to a decrease in the binding affinity of the dimer with the regulatory E-box sequences, and likely modify the transactivation functions of TWIST1 [12, 15, 20], resulting in an imbalance in the TWIST1/TWIST1 homodimer and in the TE heterodimer during the developmental process [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, For five of the 12 distinct combinations of smoothing half-window κ and spatial window λ investigated using SArKS, the k-mer CCACCTGC was identified at the positions s i with maximal values ofŷ i (the k-mers GCACACCTT, TGGAACTCACT, CCTGGAAC, and CAGCCTGG (identified using two distinct parameter combinations at the same suffix index i) were associated the highestŷ i values using the remaining seven parameter combinations). The octamer CCACCTGC contains the canonical core recognition E-box sequence CANNTG (specifically, the E12-box variant CACCTG (Bouard et al, 2016); we note that the significant SArKS peak set contains many peaks corresponding to the 7-mer CACCTGC as well as the longer octamer adding the extra initial C). Comparison of CCACCTGC with known motifs from the JASPAR database using tomtom finds some evidence of similarity to 10 TF-binding motifs (SNAI2, MAX, SCRT2, SCRT1, TCF3, MNT, Id2, MAX::MYC, TCF4, and FIGLA; q-values of 0.14 for each), though no similarities significant at q ≤ 0.1.…”
Section: S3222 Top Motifs Identified In Sequences Upstream Of Tssmentioning
confidence: 93%