Deciphering vertical deformation and poroelastic parameters in a tectonically active fault-bound aquifer using InSAR and well level data, San Bernardino basin, California

Abstract

S U M M A R YUsing InSAR and hydrogeologic time-series spanning 1995 to 2000, we characterize the elastic storage and surface deformation in the vicinity of the San Bernardino basin, California. The region encompasses a complex major aquifer located at the junction of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults that supplies groundwater to over 600,000 people. We remove the elastic vertical surface displacement associated with changes in groundwater levels from the InSAR time-series by a least squares inversion. Our method estimates a poroelastic ratio at 60 well sites, which we normalize by basin depth, allowing for comparison of the elastic response of the aquifer skeleton from site to site. Our method also estimates residual vertical displacement rates at each well site, surface displacement not explained by observed trends in groundwater levels. Residual vertical displacement rates reveal patterns of subsidence and uplift across the basin over the 5-yr period from 1995 to 2000. In a narrow zone of observed residual subsidence near the San Jacinto fault, where many normalized poroelastic ratios trend higher than expected, we find permanent compaction of clay-rich strata to be the most likely explanation for 0.5-2.0 mm yr -1 of residual subsidence. This permanent compaction is likely a result of delayed compaction due to previous overdraft conditions and/or a result of the installation of deep production wells during the span of the InSAR time-series. Observations of localized subsidence within stepovers of the San Jacinto fault zone and relative uplift at the range fronts are consistent with current basin development models; however, interseismic strain modelling of the regional faults does not reproduce the surface displacement pattern or magnitude of these observations.

Uplift of the Western Transverse Ranges and Ventura Area of Southern California: A Four‐Technique Geodetic Study Combining GPS, InSAR, Leveling, and Tide Gauges

“…We see rapid subsidence in the Ventura basin, Los Angeles basin, Cuyama Valley, Chino Valley, Antelope Valley in the western Mojave Desert, and southern San Joaquin Valley, that are likely related to groundwater changes and in some cases hydrocarbon pumping (Figure 9). In many cases the boundaries of the basin-related signals are sharp and are fault controlled, as seen in previous studies (Argus et al, 2005;Bawden et al, 2001;Watson et al, 2002;Wisely & Schmidt, 2010). In many cases the boundaries of the basin-related signals are sharp and are fault controlled, as seen in previous studies (Argus et al, 2005;Bawden et al, 2001;Watson et al, 2002;Wisely & Schmidt, 2010).…”

Slow Slip Event On the Southern San Andreas Fault Triggered by the 2017 Mw8.2 Chiapas (Mexico) Earthquake

“…This reversal in the sense of vertical motion across the fault could be due to temporal variations in the pumping and recharge of water in the Coachella valley, influenced in part by multiyear regional variations in precipitation. Similar anomalous vertical deformation due to hydrological processes, specifically in the Coachella valley as well as other regions, has been observed in the past (Bawden et al, ; Schmidt et al, ; Wisely & Schmidt, ). Similar differential vertical motion can be observed along the fault trace farther to the south.…”

High‐resolution interseismic velocity data along the San Andreas Fault from GPS and InSAR

“…Due to the ambiguity of the InSAR LOS direction, we could not detect if the ground is moving horizontally or vertically. Vertical motion could be caused by fluid flow within the porous brittle fault zone [ Byerlee , ; Wisely and Schmidt , ]. As far as we know, this peculiar deformation signal on the creeping section and its cause has not been understood by previous workers.…”