2020
DOI: 10.1177/1476127020927483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision comprehensiveness and the outcomes of firms: Reinterpreting and extending a recent meta-analysis

Abstract: Disagreement and debate are the lifeblood of any scientific field. With that truth in mind, we express our disagreement with some of the conclusions drawn by Samba et al. in a generally well-conducted meta-analysis recently published in Strategic Organization. We carefully reexamine several aspects of their study and suggest that two of their key conclusions are flawed because of misinterpretations of data and analyses. We present new findings that call into question their conclusion that observed positive rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we outline several attentional processes that occur during a period of disruption. Attentional processes in the executive suite are prone to time compression, where higher decision comprehensiveness offers pronounced benefits in stable contexts, not in dynamic environments (Heavey et al ., 2009; Miller and McKee, 2020). Our study then expands on Magistretti et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we outline several attentional processes that occur during a period of disruption. Attentional processes in the executive suite are prone to time compression, where higher decision comprehensiveness offers pronounced benefits in stable contexts, not in dynamic environments (Heavey et al ., 2009; Miller and McKee, 2020). Our study then expands on Magistretti et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%