2001
DOI: 10.1002/mar.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision constraints and consideration‐set formation in consumer durables

Abstract: The central argument of this article is that the initial phases of the consumer decision process have a major effect on product evaluation and choice. Specifically, the need-arousal event and the consequent retrieval of product-related decision constraints from memory substantially influence the ensuing processes of external information search and alternative evaluation. Several hypotheses based on previous experimental research are formulated to capture these influences. Survey data from a large sample of new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These respondents should have already formed a consideration set to a certain extent, and considered car brands can be retrieved from memory in a simulated purchase situation. Given the focus on goals as ultimate determinants of market structure, other possible determinants, such as income or dealer proximity, will not be investigated (see, e.g., Punj & Brookes, 2001).…”
Section: Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These respondents should have already formed a consideration set to a certain extent, and considered car brands can be retrieved from memory in a simulated purchase situation. Given the focus on goals as ultimate determinants of market structure, other possible determinants, such as income or dealer proximity, will not be investigated (see, e.g., Punj & Brookes, 2001).…”
Section: Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which cars would you take into account in your choice decision?" Respondents could list up to five brands (see Punj & Brookes, 2001, 2003, for a similar approach). Because only 14.5% of the respondents considered more than four brands, the restriction of the consideration set to a maximum number of five brands seems appropriate.…”
Section: Operationalizing the Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the set that is actively considered in the choice process and is a subset of the objective choice-set (see footnote 13). The size of this set may vary from all theoretically possible alternatives to a single alternative or even none at all (Punj and Brookes 2001). 13 The objective travel choice-set as determined by the location of activities, the available travel alternatives between activity locations (in terms of quality and density of road infrastructure and public transport services, transport policies and fiscal regulations) and a person's capabilities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers screen the alternatives to narrow down their awareness set (Desai and Hoyer, 2000;Punj and Brookes, 2001) to form the consideration set. This set consists of products that they would consider carefully for decision-making (Roberts and Lattin, 1991).…”
Section: Consideration Setmentioning
confidence: 99%