2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2017.2714902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Directed Retention-Failure Recovery With Channel Update for MLC NAND Flash Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MLC flash memory channel model in [11] is adopted here. According to [27]- [32], the read voltage of a 2-bit MLC NAND cell can be expressed by…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The MLC flash memory channel model in [11] is adopted here. According to [27]- [32], the read voltage of a 2-bit MLC NAND cell can be expressed by…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last one, n i , is cell-to-cell interference (CCI) caused by the voltage changing of neighbor cells, and it can be estimated and efficiently eliminated by pre-distortion [33], [34]. In summary, the cell threshold voltage of each state can be approximated using a Gaussian model [11], given by…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [20], cumulative distribution was estimated by either employing multiple sensing and decoding or interpolation with a bounded function. A retention-aware belief-propagation assisted channel update algorithm adjusted the input LLR of the second round decoding by estimating the mean and variance of the threshold voltage distribution under the assumption that the voltage distribution follows a Gaussian distribution [21]. Although these parametric-search-based schemes have attempted to estimate threshold voltage distribution and corresponding read reference voltages without knowledge of retention time, they rely on information acquired from multiple sensing and decoding, which results in excessive read latency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%